Canadians are polarized, and intense party loyalty could be to blame: study

Click to play video: 'What you need to know about Canadian general elections'
What you need to know about Canadian general elections
WATCH: What you need to know about Canadian general elections – Sep 12, 2019

OTTAWA — Social media might not be to blame for Canadians’ ideological polarization, a new report on digital democracy in Canada finds.

The latest findings are from an ongoing effort led by the Public Policy Forum and McGill University’s Max Bell School of Public Policy called the Digital Democracy Project.

“A lot of people don’t use social media very actively,” said Eric Merkley, a researcher on the project. “People on Twitter are not representative of the broader population.”

Instead, the study argues polarization in Canada arises partly from intense party loyalty and how far apart Canada’s political parties are, meaning party positions are an important factor.

Also, researchers found that people did not appear to make meaningful distinctions in their views between politicians from opposing parties and their supporters.

Story continues below advertisement

“This is troubling,” the study says, because it suggests “polarization does not just influence people’s opinions about the parties, but also how they view ordinary Canadians.” Each other, in other words.

Researchers found evidence that Canadians are “affectively polarized” — they feel negatively towards other people simply for being part of the opposing group.

That was based on three measures, including the levels of warmth participants in the study feel for their ideological comrades and opponents; how much they associate their allies and opponents with positive and negative traits; and how comfortable they feel with having someone from an opposing ideology as a neighbour, friend or relative.

“Partisans have substantially colder and more negative feelings about ideologically opposed parties, compared to those that are ideologically proximate,” and also see opposed parties as “more socially distant,” the study says.

WATCH: 2019 federal election campaign gets underway

Click to play video: '2019 federal election campaign gets underway'
2019 federal election campaign gets underway

The study goes on to note that though Canadians do seem to be polarized, it’s probably not our use of social media that is causing the divide.

Story continues below advertisement

Based on an analysis of the activity of about 50,000 Twitter accounts, the Digital Democracy Project researchers found evidence supporting the theory that users tend to create “filter bubbles” for themselves. Very few partisans, it found, follow information sources from other parties.

But the study suggests the echo chambers do not extend far beyond Twitter.

By comparing the Twitter data to information gleaned from the survey, researchers also found just 16 per cent of Canadians are exposed to strongly partisan news sources. A tiny fraction — fewer than one per cent — get more than half their news from “partisan-congenial” outlets.

Most Canadians still engage broadly with mainstream news sources, the study suggests.

If media consumption is not to blame for polarization, the answer the study offers instead is that “the biggest driver of polarization seems to be ideology and partisanship themselves.”

Strong partisans have much more intense feelings towards opposing parties than weak partisans, the study finds.

The study also notes parties in Canada have shifted ideologically over time, and in particular the Liberals have become ideologically closer to the NDP. The changing ideological distance might also play a role, the study notes.

Story continues below advertisement

WATCH: Andrew Scheer attacks Justin Trudeau on taxes

Click to play video: 'Federal Election 2019: Andrew Scheer attacks Justin Trudeau on taxes'
Federal Election 2019: Andrew Scheer attacks Justin Trudeau on taxes

“It seems to suggest Canadians are attentive to the positions of the parties, how extreme they are or how moderate they are relative to their own beliefs,” Merkley said.

Merkley and his fellow researchers will be tracking the level of affective polarization throughout the election campaign, and he said he “fully expects there might be changes.”

Because of the role ideological distance plays, parties “have a role in increasing and dampening polarization,” Merkley said.

“If parties choose to stake out more extreme positions, we might see more affective polarization as a result.”

Story continues below advertisement

Most Canadians feel society is ‘broken’

Meanwhile, a recent Ipsos poll found that the majority of Canadians think politicians aren’t concerned with people like them. Darrell Bricker, CEO of Ipsos, said that the general sentiments “create a series of difficulties for all the parties.”

“It’s not like one party is seen as a specific solution to any of this or specifically tapping into this,” he said. “What it is, is that it creates a different context for everybody that’s out there.”

Politics, Bricker said, has become more “tribal” and the distribution of political support has changed in Canada.

— With files from Global News reporter Kerri Breen

Sponsored content