For second time, William Sandeson appeals conviction in Taylor Samson murder

William Sandeson is appealing his murder conviction and sentence in the 2015 killing of Taylor Samson.

Sandeson was found guilty of second-degree murder in February. During the trial, he had claimed he killed Samson in self-defence during a cannabis deal on the evening of Aug. 15, 2015.

The Crown had argued that Sandeson, who was 23 at the time and about to begin studying medicine at Dalhousie University, was buried in debt and planned to kill Samson that night to steal the 20 pounds of cannabis he had previously arranged to buy for $40,000.

In the end, the 12 jurors found Sandeson guilty of second-degree murder.

Get daily National news

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up

By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

It was Sandeson’s second trial for Samson’s murder. He was initially found guilty of first-degree murder after his first trial in 2017, but the conviction was overturned in June 2020 after the Court of Appeal found that a mistrial should have been granted.

Last month, Justice James Chipman ruled that Sandeson be ineligible for parole for 15 years — though Sandeson has already been in custody for seven years and eight months, so he will be eligible for parole in 2030.

In a handwritten notice of appeal filed Monday, Sandeson claimed Chipman erred in law by failing to remedy an abuse in process.

Sandeson also said the trial judge failed to find that his charter rights had been violated under Section 8 of the charter, which states that “everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure.”

The notice of appeal did not provide details of Sandeson’s claims, but in his initial appeal of the 2017 trial, he complained that he was detained prior to his first interview and denied a right to counsel, that his cellphone was illegally searched and seized and that his apartment was illegally searched.

In his most recent appeal, Sandeson requested that a stay of proceedings be issued in regards to the alleged abuse in process, or that evidence obtained under the alleged breach of his charter rights be excluded.