Coronavirus: No scientific evidence airport screening measures work, experts say

Click to play video: 'How airports are screening for the coronavirus' How airports are screening for the coronavirus
WATCH: (Jan. 24, 2020) As more cases of a new coronavirus are being reported, major airports around the world are putting screening measures in place in an attempt to contain the virus. – Jan 24, 2020

Screening people at airports for signs of a new coronavirus isn’t likely to detect too many cases, health experts say.

As governments around the world work to contain the spread of a new coronavirus, which likely originating in Wuhan, China, one of the measures they’re taking is to screen passengers going through airports.

READ MORE: Woman in her 20s confirmed as 3rd case of coronavirus in Ontario

In Canada, travellers arriving in Vancouver, Toronto and Montreal are being advised to notify border officers if they’re feeling sick. A question at customs kiosks also asks whether they’re experiencing respiratory symptoms.

If a person has symptoms, they may be questioned by a quarantine officer, who could order them to report for a medical examination.

Story continues below advertisement

If the passenger is not showing symptoms, but has been to Wuhan or other affected areas, they may be provided with information on who to contact if they begin to get sick.

In some countries, officials are scanning people’s temperatures for signs of fever.

Click to play video: 'Health minister says feds not ruling out quarantine for coronavirus evacuees' Health minister says feds not ruling out quarantine for coronavirus evacuees
Health minister says feds not ruling out quarantine for coronavirus evacuees – Jan 31, 2020

Screening measures might not be doing much to spot cases though, said Dr. Allison McGeer, an infectious disease specialist at Toronto’s Sinai Health System, who contracted SARS while fighting the outbreak in 2003.

“The best evidence is that in any of the circumstances that people have either tested or done with modelling … they make very little difference,” she said.

“If you ask me, is there scientific evidence that says it works? Absolutely not.”

A study of Canadian airport screening measures during the SARS outbreak found that while hundreds of thousands of passengers were screened, and some were referred for follow-up checks, officials didn’t spot a single case of SARS.

Story continues below advertisement

READ MORE: Coronavirus — Did Ottawa wait too long to evacuate Canadians? Health experts say no

Partly, this is because of the sheer number of travellers and how quickly people can get around the world, the authors wrote.

[ Sign up for our Health IQ newsletter for the latest coronavirus updates ]

“Given the relatively short travel time, detecting persons at the border who are incubating any of the known infectious disease pathogens is unlikely,” they wrote.

“The absence of symptoms or signs of infection and a corresponding lack of specific, extremely rapid, easy-to-use diagnostic tests make border detection of infectious diseases unlikely.”

Preliminary estimates by a team from the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, released this week, suggested that thermal scanning would identify fewer than one in five passengers infected with the coronavirus.

READ MORE: U.S. announces mandatory quarantines, entry ban over Coronavirus

There’s a simple reason, the authors said: you’d have to actually have a fever while you’re in the airport.

Many people might not show symptoms until several days after they’re infected. Officials said Friday that Canada’s fourth case of coronavirus, a woman in London, Ont., didn’t have any symptoms while she was on the plane.

Story continues below advertisement

“Fever screening doesn’t work because lots of people come during the incubation period,” McGeer said.

“And when you have a fever, you don’t have a fever for 24 hours. You have fever intermittently.”

Some people with chronic conditions have a constantly elevated body temperature, too, she said.

Click to play video: 'Coronavirus outbreak: 3rd patient was asymptomatic upon returning to Canada' Coronavirus outbreak: 3rd patient was asymptomatic upon returning to Canada
Coronavirus outbreak: 3rd patient was asymptomatic upon returning to Canada – Jan 31, 2020

“There are a lot of limitations to doing temperature screening,” said Jason Kindrachuk, an assistant professor and Canada Research Chair in emerging viruses at the University of Manitoba.

One other potential problem is that staff have to be adequately trained to properly take a temperature with an infrared thermometer.

“Is that person trained well enough to know that you have to be at a certain distance to get an accurate reading? Because if you’re a bit too far, you’re not necessarily reading that person’s temperature, you’re reading air temperature,” Kindrachuk said.

Story continues below advertisement

COMMENTARY: Ottawa faces challenges at home and with China as coronavirus spreads

Kindrachuk is also concerned that temperature screening might provide a false sense of security, and even discourage people from going to the doctor if they start feeling sick, because they already passed one screening.

Asking people to report their symptoms also relies a lot on trust, he said.

“The trust factor is where I think a lot of people are concerned. Are people just going to lie or try to hide symptoms so that they can get through security?”

Some cases will always slip through, he said, but flight records and other travel data can help to identify travellers who might need more screening.

McGeer thinks that Canada’s current screening measures are striking an appropriate balance, reassuring the public that the government is vigilant while not spending too much time on things that haven’t been shown to work.

“I think they’re being totally reasonable,” she said.

“There’s no perfect answer to this. You have to kind of work with the circumstances and the logistics.”

Harsher measures, like travel bans or closing borders, have economic and other consequences, she said.

Story continues below advertisement

“You say, ‘Well that’s just money.’ Right. But it’s not just mone, it’s jobs.”

Taking someone’s livelihood away can have terrible consequences for their life, she said.

READ MORE: New coronavirus an international public health emergency, WHO declares

The World Health Organization, meanwhile, is not currently recommending travel restrictions.

“Evidence has shown that restricting the movement of people and goods during public health emergencies may be ineffective and may divert resources from other interventions,” it said in a statement earlier this week.

Kindrachuk thinks that if the outbreak gets worse — particularly if we start seeing more person-to-person transmission outside China — Canadian officials might want to suggest that travellers from affected regions voluntarily quarantine themselves when they get home.

McGeer believes that public health authorities need to learn to better manage the public’s anxiety about new diseases.

“We’re in real danger now of the fear taking over and of doing things that will do substantial amounts of harm without benefit,” she said.

Sponsored content