The firing squad execution of Fort Hood shooter Nidal Malik Hasan will be livestreamed, the Pentagon said Thursday, a stunning revelation about plans for the first military execution in more than 65 years after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had described it as being “public.”
The Army announced this week that the execution would take place at Fort Hood on Dec. 3 after Hasan was convicted of killing 13 people and injuring 32 others in a shooting at the military base in 2009.
Hegseth, speaking to the conservative TV outlet Real America’s Voice News on Wednesday, said, “We’ll make sure that people are able to watch it, that it’s public.” Officials in the Pentagon clarified Thursday that the execution would be livestreamed and that more details would follow.
The revelation from Hegseth about the public nature of an execution — let alone one as violent as a firing squad — has raised further questions about how the death penalty is carried out in the United States, especially after the botched lethal injection of Christa Pike in Tennessee.
Experts offer mixed reactions on the plan
Hasan could choose to resist execution and file a habeas petition in civilian court, which is a legal request for a court to review the legality of someone’s detention, and could significantly delay the execution, experts on military law said.
“It frankly might outlast the current administration, and who knows if the next one will have the same penchant for executions,” said Eugene R. Fidell, a visiting lecturer at Yale Law School specializing in military law.
Deborah Denno, a death penalty expert and law professor at Fordham University, said livestreaming an execution could make the process “much more transparent” and inform the public about all that capital punishment entails. Those are benefits that she said would be useful at a time when Pike’s botched execution has raised fresh questions about the manner by which criminal defendants are put to death for their crimes.
“I think it could possibly be a good idea because it would be transparent and the public would be fully aware that it’s happening,” she said.
Denno acknowledged that there may need to be public policy discussions about the platform hosting the livestream and what age or other viewing restrictions might be necessary. But she said that on balance, “It’s not such a far-fetched idea.”
On the other hand, Elisabeth Semel, co-director of the Death Penalty Clinic at UC Berkeley Law, said Hegseth’s announcement raises a host of legal and public policy questions, including concerns for the dignity of the defendant, who will be eligible to view the execution and what the Trump administration has in mind in opting for an unusual spectacle.
Though there has been long-running discussion about the idea of televising an execution, “I don’t recall a situation in which it was instituted by the government. I think that also raises serious questions about what is the motivation of the government,” she said.
Get breaking National news
“This is a president who’s about spectacle and that’s, I think, precisely the message that he intends to deliver,” Semel said, adding that she was skeptical that the administration had given second thought to the legal and social questions being presented by the decision.
Trump has spoken out against public executions in Iran
Trump, who approved Hasan’s execution, has previously been critical of public executions in Iran, at times using the possibility of protesters being killed by the Iranian government as a possible rationale for military action. Those warnings preceded his ultimate choice to attack Iran at the end of February.
“We’ve been told that the killing in Iran is stopping,” Trump told reporters on Jan. 14. “It’s stopping, and there’s no plan for executions.”
He repeated that on Jan. 20 at a White House press briefing. Slightly more than a month later in his State of the Union address, Trump said, “We stopped them from hanging a lot of them with the threat of serious violence.”
The White House on Thursday referred questions about the plans for the livestreamed execution to the Pentagon.
Hegseth was asked Wednesday if Hasan had made any final requests or reached out to the Trump administration. The Pentagon chief simply replied: “Don’t care. We’ll see him on Dec. 3.”
It’s not clear if Hasan will try to appeal
Hasan, an Army psychiatrist who held the rank of major, walked into a medical building on Nov. 5, 2009, where soldiers were waiting in long lines to receive immunizations and medical clearance for deployment. He shouted “Allahu akbar” — Arabic for “God is great!” — and opened fire with a laser-sighted handgun. He also shot at the backs of soldiers fleeing toward the parking lot.
Hasan said it was an effort to stop them from going to Afghanistan and killing his fellow Muslims. A military judge barred him from presenting that as a defense during his 2013 trial. Hasan was left paralyzed from the waist down after being shot in the back by law enforcement, and he now uses a wheelchair.
Hasan could seek a lengthy delay of his execution, though given his behavior at trial, he may not want to.
After firing his lawyers and representing himself, Hasan began his portion of the trial by telling jurors he was the gunman. He said little else over the next three weeks, which convinced his court-appointed standby lawyers that Hasan’s only goal was to get a death sentence.
As the trial progressed, those suspicions grew. The military called nearly 90 witnesses, but Hasan rested his case without calling a single person to testify in his defense and made no closing argument. Yet he leaked documents during the trial to journalists that revealed him telling military mental health workers that he could “ still be a martyr ” if executed.
Attorney John Galligan, a former military judge who had represented Hasan in several civil matters following his criminal trial, spoke with Hasan Wednesday but is barred from offering much detail about that conversation. He is not representing Hasan in his criminal case but said he’s worried about his physical health under the plan laid out by officials, and that Hasan has not yet had access to legal counsel.
Galligan said that according to Hasan, the commandant of the facility brought a chaplain but no attorney from either the Trial Defense Service or from his civilian defense when he was notified that Trump had signed off on his execution. Galligan called that a breach of Army regulations.
A spokeswoman for the Army said Thursday that multiple attempts were made to contact Trial Defense Service attorneys, saying they made every reasonable effort and adhered to policy.
“The civilian counsel was not reasonably available to be physically present for the notification on the 5th,” the spokeswoman said, adding that counsel was located in Virginia, but did not provide a name.
The spokeswoman also said Hasan has not been kept from contacting and communicating with his counsel.
Hegseth said the military hasn’t executed a service member by firing squad since World War II. The last military execution took place on April 13, 1961, when Army Pvt. John Bennett was executed by hanging.
Amnesty International said in its report on executions in 2025 that it knew of at least 17 public executions — 11 in Iran and 6 in Afghanistan.
This was an effective way to deter crime, and I’m glad that criminals will come to know they cannot get away with hurting and killing people. I would even like to be the one to do the injection.
Trump should join him
Ben, spin another strawman, you well-poisoning, liberal bootlicker
Authoritarianism divides society into an in group and an out group. Under it the law protects the in group but does not bind it. The law also binds the out group but does not protect it.
Republicans would rather children watch a man be executed than a drag queen read.
@ 10:52 Anonymous – “Judge not, that ye be not judged.
For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.
And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?”
Someone mentioned the Bible below. The Bible said earth was created over six days. Evolutionary science seems to contradict that. I guess what I don’t understand is why people who believe the Bible pick and choose which parts they want to use. There may or may not be a creator, as we cannot prove or disprove this adequately. If there is a creator, one would think they would be benevolent. Personally, I don’t associate the bible or religion with benevolence.
Livestreamed, will it also have commercials for gun sales? I can see it now;
“Our’s is the best brand of ammunition ( or rifle) to use while shooting up a school or immigrants. Accuracy and reliability”
Gun culture in America, entertainment for the masses.
I love it when the left tries to tell Christians what Jesus would do. Like they have any clue
Anonymous
October 9, 2026 at 7:57 am
Hegseth is a vile person. He perverts religion to behave in the most inhumane ways. This is their test case. The cult feeds on cruelty. Look at the enthusiastic support from the amoral in these comments.
What would Jesus do?
Maybe you should read the bible its clear as day what happens when a man sheds another mans blood.
Long time ago in the USA public hangings were common to deter crime…this is what happens when you break the law…the Democrats and Liberals oppose this….why? Because all criminals lives matter and they can be rehabilitated. Ha !
Ohhh Benny no one cares what you think bud.
And that’s how it supposed to be done.
If you don’t want to see it then don’t watch it. Simple.
Besides, most probably it’ll be blurred anyway.
What is society becoming ? This is nuts, I believe in capital punishment but I certainly don’t believe it should be available to the general population to watch !
And all of the liberals cry about civilian court when its a military tribunal.
Have fun cucknuts.
Man kills 13 and injures 32
Man is Muslim
Left cries about his public execution
Man is popular YouTuber
Man kills nobody
Man is Christian
Man is publicly assassinated
Left celebrates and has anniversary parties
@Anonymous 921 pm. You said committing evil should be punished. I could argue Hegseth and Trump murdered 120 schoolchildren in Iran is evil. Could also argue shooting an alleged drug smuggling boat, and then shooting survivors is very evil. Hegseth saying “kill everybody” is very evil. Who will pay for these crimes? Why isn’t the right calling for these acts of evil to be avenged?
Hegseth is a vile person. He perverts religion to behave in the most inhumane ways. This is their test case. The cult feeds on cruelty. Look at the enthusiastic support from the amoral in these comments.
What would Jesus do?
@Very good. The USA joins Iran and North Korea in performing a public execution. I personally think it’s barbaric and is only happening to excite MAGA.
Good.
What a sh!th0le country.
As it should, it’s a deterrent. Don’t want to be killed by a firing squad, don’t be a scourge of society.
What is the point of showing a well deserved act of justice to a killer but to cover up some other act that the government is trying to hide .but why televised on thing but cover up something else that is going on .why isn’t the nazism that immigration control enforcement is blindly wildly doing is allowed to continue without being liable when they are mistakenly attacking the wrong victim and DON’T ADMIT THEIR WRONG DOING
As it should be. Committing evil has real consequences, something that a lot of people now days do not understand.
Get out the popcorn folks, maybe one day libscum traitors
First the botched lethal injection, then this. The death penalty is barbaric. If indeed the arguement for killing this man is “justice” (it’s not), wanting to put this live is very morally disturbing. This is not public entertainment. What the US is turning to is a certain news channel starting with an “F”. And really Global, opening this up to comment is morally questionable.