One of the largest annual gatherings of Canada’s forestry sector is underway in B.C. and perhaps, not surprisingly, Aboriginal title and the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, are top of mind for many.
More than 600 industry, government and First Nations representatives are discussing the issues facing B.C.’s struggling forest industry.
Terry Teegee, the Regional Chief of the B.C. Assembly of First Nations, gave the keynote speech at the conference. He once again offered reassurances that, while First Nations leaders reject any changes to DRIPA, this does not threaten private property.
“Private property is private property,” Teegee said.
“No First Nations want anything to do with private property. Rather, negotiations need to be had with this provincial government in regard to title. At the core of this commitment is free, prior, and informed consent.
“These are not barriers to development. They are the conditions that allow development to proceed in a way that holds value for generations to come. When the approach is consistent, it supports stability across the sector.”
Get daily National news
Teegee told the conference that DRIPA should be fully implemented to allow for predictability and sustainability of forestry, mining and other resource industries.
On Thursday, the First Nations Leadership Council said B.C. Premier David Eby has “broken the trust” built between his late predecessor, John Horgan, and First Nations.
The scathing response comes after Eby sent a letter to Indigenous leaders on Wednesday, saying he regrets not having more time in the legislative calendar to talk about the government’s plans to suspend sections of DRIPA, which has created political and legal friction.
In its statement, the leadership council says the suspension has been “falsely framed” by Eby as “a compromise and an accommodation,” saying its effect is the same as amending the legislation, which First Nations have previously opposed.
Also on Thursday, the leader of the Conservative Party of Canada said the federal government needs to take a stand to protect private property rights.
Pierre Poilievre laid out a four-point plan that Conservatives want to see implemented.
“ Rather, negotiations need to be had with this provincial government in regard to title.” Why what is that you are really trying to angle for?
Why is that still needed then? Is that so you can leverage all sort of fees and restitution payments out of the Government? That is essentially still making the private property owner pay a new tax for land he already owns.
Don’t give any more inches.
Get a written legal statement with FN forgoing all any and types of fees or payments etc for any future private or public they may be given honorary title too.
Legal binding for zero compensation of any sort. Because in the end it’s the taxpayer who pays.