The Canadian Centre of Recovery Excellence (CoRE) said a study it conducted found the closure of an overdose prevention site in Red Deer, Alta., did not result in an increase deaths, emergency department visits or ambulance calls for site users.
“After the site was closed, there was a significant number of people who had used the overdose prevention centre who were now taking evidence-based treatment medication,” CoRE chief scientific officer Nathaniel Day said.
“I think the very people that society is trying to reach with harm reduction services like supervised consumption can be helped, and they can move towards the life they and their family has them.”
The study looked into two provincially regulated OPS programs in the province, in Red Deer and Lethbridge. Red Deer’s closed in 2024, and the one in Lethbridge remained open.
CoRE studied the outcomes for the Red Deer clients but also compared them to clients using the similar program in the Lethbridge program.
The government of Alberta is praising the study. Mental Health and Addictions Minister Rick Wilson said he has to review the study to consider if other supervised consumption site should also close.
Get daily National news
“Having a report like this with evidence-based and taking a look to make sure that we’re not doing harm I guess is important to me, so that’s one of the things I’ll be considering,” Wilson said.
Wilson also said in a statement to Global News, it thanks CoRE for “producing rigorous, high-quality research that helps inform responsible and evidence-based addiction policy.”
Dr. Monty Ghosh, an addiction specialist, said the study was well done, and it’s important to note there was more support for site users.
“One of the things that they did involve during the transition period was this rapid response team, so that did consist of two clinicians who were going around the site, responding to overdoses on a regular basis, they were there 24/7,” Ghosh said.
Ghosh does warn that just because this study is out there, it shouldn’t be a reason to shut down other supervised consumption sites.
“We need more evidence as much as we can. Whether it’s good or bad, whether it speaks for or against supervised consumption sites and I don’t think this one does either to be honest with you.”
–with files from Jasmine King
I’m trying to find the study you’re talking about since you didn’t properly site it: the link to the “study” is your own article. I’d love to see the actual study if you are willing to properly cite where you got your information and quotes from!