Advertisement

Manitoba cabinet minister hints at issues with premier’s remarks on Canadian history

Click to play video: 'Manitoba cabinet minister hints at issues with premier’s remarks on Canadian history' Manitoba cabinet minister hints at issues with premier’s remarks on Canadian history
A Manitoba cabinet minister, saying she cannot support remarks if they add to the hurt of traumatized people, has distanced herself slightly from Premier Brian Pallister’s comments on Canadian history – Jul 23, 2021

A Manitoba cabinet minister, saying she cannot support remarks if they add to the hurt of traumatized people, has distanced herself slightly from Premier Brian Pallister’s comments on Canadian history.

Conservation and Climate Minister Sarah Guillemard was asked Friday for her reaction to Pallister’s remarks earlier this month that have drawn widespread condemnation from Indigenous leaders.

Read more: Manitoba government is ‘rewriting history,’ former senior bureaucrat says

“We are not here to add any hurt to traumatized people, and I don’t believe that anyone in their hearts intend(s) to do so, but again, we all need to listen, we all need to learn, and we need to grow together,” Guillemard said.

Story continues below advertisement

Guillemard made similar comments on social media last week, without naming the premier, when she said she could not support hurtful remarks. She was asked Friday whether the subject of her social media post included the premier’s comments.

Click to play video: 'Indigenous leaders call for change in Manitoba' Indigenous leaders call for change in Manitoba
Indigenous leaders call for change in Manitoba – Jul 20, 2021

“If that added hurt to traumatized people, absolutely,” she replied.

The controversy started after protesters toppled two statues of Queen Elizabeth and Queen Victoria on the legislature grounds. Pallister denounced the vandalism, and said people who came to Canada — both before and after it became a country — did not come to destroy anything but rather to build communities, churches and businesses.

Indigenous leaders said Pallister was downplaying the harmful effects of colonialism. The premier stood by his words, added he never used the word colonialism, and said he was trying to appeal for people to work together.

Story continues below advertisement

Read more: Eileen Clarke says resignation due to ‘inappropriate words and actions’

Pallister’s Indigenous relations minister quit her cabinet post two days later. Her replacement, Alan Lagimodiere, stirred up more anger by defending some of the intent behind residential schools. He fully apologized.

The fallout grew when two Indigenous business leaders resigned from government economic development boards. One called for Pallister to resign.

Other members of the Progressive Conservative cabinet did not directly answer Friday when asked whether they support Pallister’s remarks on Canadian history.

Click to play video: 'Pallister says he ‘stands by’ comments following Eileen Clarke resignation' Pallister says he ‘stands by’ comments following Eileen Clarke resignation
Pallister says he ‘stands by’ comments following Eileen Clarke resignation – Jul 14, 2021

“If we’re talking right now, we’re not listening. We need to listen, continue to listen, have input and move forward with reconciliation,” said Derek Johnson, minister of municipal relations.

Story continues below advertisement

“The benefits I’ve had as a (legislature member) is that I continue to learn every day about new things and old things, in terms of residential schools and the reconciliation process, and we’re going down that path,” said Reg Helwer, minister of central services.

Read more: Protesters rally for Lagimodiere, Pallister resignations after residential school comments

One political analyst said the Progressive Conservative caucus seems to be sending a message.

“It gives a sense of where the caucus and cabinet are with Pallister right now,” said Royce Koop, who teaches political studies at the University of Manitoba.

“There’s dissatisfaction and a willingness to gently criticize and contradict the premier. But there’s no appetite to openly and aggressively denounce his comments.”

 

 

Sponsored content