Supreme Court of Canada won’t hear bid to suspend Quebec’s secularism law

Members of the National Council of Muslims Mustafa Farooq, left, and Bochra Manai, centre, and Noa Mendelsohn Aviv a member of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) speak to reporters at the Quebec Court of Appeal in Montreal, Tuesday, Nov. 26, 2019. Graham Hughes/The Canadian Press

A challenge by Canadian civil rights groups and a university student to suspend parts of Quebec’s religious neutrality law will not be heard by the Supreme Court of Canada.

The law, known as Bill 21, bars some public-sector employees — including teachers, police officers and judges — from wearing religious symbols in the workplace. It was adopted in the provincial legislature in June 2019.

The decision comes after the groups sought leave at the Supreme Court after Quebec’s highest court rejected their challenge in December.

At the time, the Quebec Court of Appeal handed down a 2-1 ruling on their application for a stay of the secularism law until a full legal challenge could be heard in Quebec Superior Court.

READ MORE: Quebec’s top court refuses to suspend province’s secularism law

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms’ notwithstanding clause allows governments to shield legislation against court challenges concerning the violation of fundamental rights and freedoms.

Story continues below advertisement

The Supreme Court’s rejection to hear the challenge was announced on Thursday. Following its usual practice, the court gave no reason for it decision.

In a statement, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) and the National Council of Canadian Muslims (NCCM) expressed disappointment at the denial but said they plan to continue fighting the law in court.

“We promised to defend Canadian civil liberties and we will continue to keep that promise,” said Mustafa Farooq, executive director of the NCCM.

“This decision, while not the one we were hoping for, is not the end of the battle.”

READ MORE: Quebec’s Bill 21 leads to ‘irreparable harm,’ civil liberties groups tell Court of Appeal

Noa Mendelsohn Aviv, equality program director with the CCLA, said the religious symbol ban has “created unnecessary division and economic hardship.”

“While we are deeply disappointed in this result, our main challenge of the law still lies ahead.”

In their challenge, the groups claimed Bill 21 is discriminatory and leads to “real and substantial harm.” They argue it unfairly targets women and limits employment opportunities.

Quebec Premier François Legault has repeatedly defended the law, saying it maintains support from the majority of citizens.

Story continues below advertisement
Click to play video: 'The battle to suspend or overturn Bill 21 continues' The battle to suspend or overturn Bill 21 continues
The battle to suspend or overturn Bill 21 continues – Jan 17, 2020

With files from the Canadian Press

Sponsored content