Advertisement

Green party’s pledge for universal pharmacare would cost $26.7B in 2020

Click to play video: 'Federal Election 2019: Green Party announces platform costing analysis'
Federal Election 2019: Green Party announces platform costing analysis
WATCH: Green party announces platform costing analysis – Sep 25, 2019

Introducing universal pharmacare would cost $26.7 billion in the first year, the federal Greenssaid Wednesday as they released a costed platform.

The pledge to ensure all Canadians have access to medication is the biggest new spending item in the Green plan, which represents the first federal party to release a platform with price tags for its pledges as reviewed by the parliamentary budget officer.

The platform shows that by fiscal year 2024-25, the Greens’ pharmacare plan would cost $31.3 billion, but by then their proposed budget has the provinces contributing $17 billion.

The Liberals and NDP have also pledged a national pharmacare program.

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh has said he would spend $10 billion a year to ensure that all necessary medication and medical devices are free at the point of care starting in 2020. When Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau made a pharmacare pledge this week, he wouldn’t say how much it would cost or when it would take full effect.

Story continues below advertisement

WATCH: May budgets for universal pharmacare in Canada if elected

Click to play video: 'Federal Election 2019: May on how she proposed to fund universal pharmacare'
Federal Election 2019: May on how she proposed to fund universal pharmacare

Trudeau has said he would be guided by a panel led by former Ontario health minister Eric Hoskins, who pegged the cost at $15.3 billion each year by 2027, when the program would be fully operational.

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

Get breaking National news

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Green Leader Elizabeth May said she didn’t expect the price tag to total $27 billion.

“The big ticket items — pharmacare — turns out to be a cost,” she said. “But it’s essential. We have to do it.”

When the parliamentary budget office came back with that unexpected tally, the party had to adjust its budget, May said, including taxing financial transactions at 0.5 per cent instead of 0.2 per cent.

Story continues below advertisement

According to the costing, that tax would bring in $18 billion a year by fiscal year 2024-25. Other new sources of revenue are largely aimed at businesses and wealthy Canadians, including increasing the corporate tax rate from 15 per cent to 21 per cent for $16 billion in revenue, closing a capital gains loophole to raise $15 billion and applying a one-per cent tax on wealth above $20 million for about $7 billion.

WATCH: Greens announce budget strategy without income tax increase

Click to play video: 'Federal Election 2019: May says Greens can fund platform without raising income tax'
Federal Election 2019: May says Greens can fund platform without raising income tax

Other big-ticket spending promises include eliminating post-secondary tuition and forgiving student debt for about $16 billion in the first year but levelling out to about $9.5 billion annually starting in year three, $5 billion for universal child care, and $9.6 billion to allocate one per cent of the GST to housing and other municipal infrastructure.

WATCH: ‘We’re not here to play politics about climate,’ says May

Click to play video: 'Federal Election 2019: ‘We’re not here to play politics about climate,’ says May'
Federal Election 2019: ‘We’re not here to play politics about climate,’ says May

The Greens propose to balance the budget in 2024-25, though May said if economic circumstances demand increased spending, they would respond to that.

Story continues below advertisement

“We’ve never been slavishly addicted to balanced budgets,” she said. “We completely agree that if you need to spend to stimulate the economy, that’s an appropriate thing to do.”

Sponsored content

AdChoices