August 9, 2019 3:24 pm
Updated: August 9, 2019 5:20 pm

Roy Green: Does legal access to firearms lead to mass shootings?

ABOVE: Canadian gun violence linked to illegal guns from U.S


The United States’ gun homicide rate in 2009 was 33 per million, according to the New York Times. In Canada and the U.K., the numbers were five per million and 0.7 per million, respectively.

Story continues below

These numbers correspond with the differences in gun ownership. The conclusion? Massive numbers of firearms owned by millions of individuals lead to horrors like the ones that recently took place in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio.

Or is that too simplistic?

READ MORE: Travel warnings for U.S. issued after mass shootings — here’s a look at the facts

Studies show there are common denominators among the perpetrators of mass shootings: early childhood trauma; an identifiable crisis point reached leading up to the shooting; shooters who had studied the actions of other shooters and sought validation for their motives; and shooters who all had the means to carry out their plans.

In other words, the shooters are unstable, have deduced others will pay for their own real or imagined misfortunes and have access to guns.

WATCH: Trump implies NRA must support him because ‘nobody else could have won’ in 2016

So, will changing laws to deny legal access to all firearms end or significantly reduce the immense cruelty of the shootings in El Paso or Dayton or Las Vegas?

Many will immediately respond: “Yes!”

Hunters, farmers and sport shooters, though, will vehemently disagree.

READ MORE: Walmart pulls video game ads — but not guns — after El Paso shooting

Must a person who practises uncompromising firearms safety but who also enjoys shooting sports such as Olympic events or who hunts to put food on the family table be barred from firearm ownership because of the madness of a maniac or maniacs?

Will wanton killers’ options to create mass destruction be ended by banning private ownership of firearms?

The answer is no.

READ MORE: Red flag gun laws garner ‘wave of support’ in Congress after back-to-back mass shootings

The issue in the United States is one of ease of access to firearms — a constitutional right to bear arms. Simply put, it’s too damned easy to buy a gun in America.

I long complained about what I considered an excessive process that required jumping through regulatory hoops in order to purchase a long gun in Canada. I’m not complaining so much any longer.

It takes time, practice and proven skill to obtain a driver’s licence. Expecting the same from a person intent on purchasing a firearm is not overly regulatory.

READ MORE: Reality Check — What do the changes to Canadian gun laws mean for you?

For the United States, the firearms ownership issue must lead to significantly reduced ease of access to specific and identified types of guns, coupled with a mental health component.

Canadians are expressing strong public sentiment about the availability of handguns and assault weapons.

WATCH: Doug Ford speaks about GTA gun violence at transit announcement

Ban all personal gun ownership in Canada? Absolutely not.

However, 14 shootings in Toronto last weekend and the memories of last summer’s deaths and injuries on Toronto’s Danforth Avenue are reasons for reflection.

Roy Green is the host of the Roy Green Show on the Global News Radio network.

Listen to the latest from the Roy Green Show

Subscribe to the Roy Green Show Podcast now at Apple Podcast or Google Play

© 2019 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Report an error


Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.