The Alberta government is ordering the City of Edmonton to revert to its old rules for infill housing development — a decision Edmonton’s mayor calls uninformed and insulting.
During a news conference Thursday, Premier Danielle Smith said the city’s current policies, which have largely been in place since 2024, are too permissive and are harming homeowners by reducing property values and creating parking headaches.
“Let me be clear: the goal should not simply be more housing, but more housing that is planned and integrated in a way that works for both existing residents as well as future families,” Smith said Thursday, speaking to reporters in the backyard of a single-family home.
The premier said she worries multi-unit complexes are going up in established neighbourhoods without due consideration of whether the new builds are a good fit or have adequate parking.
“When growth outpaces the infrastructure and services that support a neighbourhood, residents feel it,” she said.
She said the city isn’t getting the necessary buy-in from existing residents, turning infill development into a property-rights issue.
“You can’t just take 10 single-family homes and put up 10 units that have 16 people in them without considering all of these things,” she said.
Smith was joined by a handful of advocates who have been calling for Edmonton to change its approach.
One group recently held a protest outside city hall with a few hundred people in attendance.
Edmonton Mayor Andrew Knack has repeatedly pushed back against the prospect of provincial involvement in municipal zoning decisions, saying land use is a local decision and it should always be so.
“I’m not entirely convinced the premier understands what she is doing and what the consequences will be,” Knack told reporters while joined by several leaders from communities surrounding Edmonton.
“Limiting homes in established neighbourhoods doesn’t stop growth. It pushes it to the edge of the city.
“Every new suburb needs new roads, pipes, fire halls, and bus routes — and that lands on your tax bill forever.”
Knack called Smith’s Thursday announcement “uninformed,” and said it would only lead to higher property taxes and less affordable housing.
“This is a significant step back in how we build out our cities,” Knack told reporters.
“Edmontonians’ lives will become less affordable because of this.”
Edmonton political analyst John Brennan says there’s irony in the province stepping into municipal affairs, when it has spent so much time calling on Ottawa politicians to stay in their lane.
“Danielle Smith is always complaining about the federal government intervening in areas of provincial jurisdiction,” Brennan said.
Get daily National news
“In fact, you could argue a number of our questions on the October 19 referendum are about this — but it doesn’t seem to stop her from intervening with municipalities.”
The Alberta government does have the legal right to force changes that many Edmonton residents have been asking for.
Brennan said it’s still heavy-handed and reeks of overreach, especially as the province has already forced changes at the local level with bike lanes and photo radar enforcement.
“In all my years in politics in Edmonton — and I’ve spent a lot of time in municipal government and politics — I’ve never seen anything like this, where a provincial government literally tells a municipal council that they’ve got to repeal their zoning bylaw and they’ve got three months to do it.”
So what now?
The 2023 zoning bylaw changes paved the way for housing redevelopment across much of Edmonton, in an effort to increase density and manage population growth.
The province is ordering the City of Edmonton to revert to the previous parameters for housing types, density and height, and to restore minimum on-site parking requirements in place before 2020.
Edmonton city council will have three months, as of Oct. 8, to comply and Smith said after that, it will be required to review and consult on its land-use rules.
The province is also ordering Calgary to maintain its current rules after that city’s council backtracked on its own zoning policies earlier this year.
The changes ordered by the province on Thursday will be in place while both cities carry out comprehensive reviews of their land use bylaws, engage in public consultation and work with industry to pursue a more balanced approach to high-density infill, the province said.
Edmonton will have 18 months to review, while the province said Calgary’s broader review, which is currently underway, is planned to be complete in 2027.
-
![]()
Calls for stricter guidelines on infill development after Parkview infill fire -
![]()
Parkview residents concerned over several infill builds within a single block -
![]()
Infill impact on Edmonton property values -
![]()
Edmonton city councillor pushing for fines against bad infill builders -
![]()
Edmonton homeowners frustrated as their properties erode into infill excavations -
![]()
Potential changes to Edmonton lodging houses -
![]()
South Edmonton communities enter into restrictive covenant to limit infill development -
![]()
Edmonton’s mayor fears infill bylaws abused to build lodging houses -
![]()
Edmonton homeowners combatting Duggan infill with restrictive covenants -
![]()
BILD Edmonton outlines 22-point action plan to help speed up infill development -
![]()
Edmonton city council hears from public on infill heights changes
Municipal Affairs Minister Dan Williams, with Smith on Thursday, said the province wasn’t issuing an ultimatum, but rather was launching a “conversation.”
“We have seen extreme examples that is dividing neighbourhoods,” Williams said. “Clearly, this demonstrably tells the province that this needs a pause and a sober second thought.”
Knack pushed back, saying a conversation after a decision has been made is not a conversation at all.
“Deadlines mean that they’re forcing,” he said.
In 2024, Smith’s government gave itself the power to rescind municipal bylaws deemed to be at odds with provincial policies.
Her government also granted itself the right to call a vote on whether a local elected official should be removed from their post if the province believes the official is unwilling or unable to do their job.
“When municipalities have taken actions that are undermining people’s property value, and you see the kind of reaction that we’ve seen from residents, then we have to step in,” Smith said.
Knack said he was considering options on how to fight Smith’s order but conceded that if he and members of council don’t follow it, they could be removed from office.
“They’re taking over land-use planning, they’re taking over our transportation planning, they’re taking over traffic safety — all at the same time of not dealing with the issues that we are asking for their support in,” Knack said.
Why are infills controversial for some?
Infill has been a contentious topic in Edmonton: from restrictive covenants to buying the neighbouring property, the rise in multi-unit builds in recent years has led some homeowners to take drastic action.
In 2023, the City of Edmonton changed zoning bylaws to allow for more multi-unit buildings up to three storeys in all neighbourhoods.
The aim was to encourage a variety of development to be built more easily in residential areas, to increase housing choices and affordability.
In early 2024, the federal government committed $175 million from the Housing Accelerator Fund program to fast-track more than 5,200 new housing units in Edmonton over three years.
But there’s been mixed reaction to the increase in multi-unit buildings replacing single-family homes.
Proponents of infill densification argue cities need to adapt to growing populations, and multiplexes offer a way to make existing neighbourhoods denser without adding to sprawl by building out into agricultural land.
Infill ended up being a contentious topic during the 2025 fall municipal election campaign after residents of established communities expressed concerns about property values, not enough parking, predatory developers, quality of builds and housing affordability.
“At the end of the day, people don’t like change,” Brennan said. “They don’t like the changes they’re seeing in their neighbourhood.”
Infill advocates suggest the province’s move is undemocratic.
“Edmontonians had their chance to have their say in this matter — it was called the 2025 municipal election,” said Jacob Dawang with Grow Together Edmonton, a volunteer organization that advocates for more housing choices.
“They chose, in great numbers, to return pro-infill councillors to council.”
Infill announcement a distraction from unpopular referendum: Brennan
So why announce a crackdown now?
“It’s a bait and switch. It’s a classic — you’re changing the topic,” Brennan said. “It gets people talking about something else other than the referendum.”
With polling numbers from the past year consistently showing about 70 per cent or more of Albertans have no interest in leaving Canada, the political analyst and strategist thinks the province is trying to distract from the vote coming up on Oct. 19.
“It’s quite clear when you see Danielle Smith’s comments on it… She doesn’t want to talk about it,” he said.
“She wants this referendum to be done, over and move on — so one of the ways you get people to move on is by changing the topic.”
The issue that’s been debated within Edmonton for years has been a point of discussion between municipal and provincial leaders in recent months.
During her weekend radio program Your Province, Your Premier in mid-September, Smith said residents affected by the developments have raised concerns with the province.
At that time, Smith said Williams was reviewing concerns related to Edmonton’s citywide rezoning approach.
The radio program is aired on 880 CHED and 770 QR Calgary, which are owned by Corus Entertainment, the parent company of Global News.
With files from Jack Farrell, The Canadian Press
-
![]()
Alberta, Saskatchewan premiers reject Musk suggesting their provinces leave Canada -
![]()
Alberta orders reversal of Edmonton’s infill housing rules amid complaints from homeowners -
![]()
ICE defends New York shooting as Mamdani calls for agency to be abolished -
![]()
Edmonton mayor says provincial infill intrusion will ‘create chaos’
Mayor Knack,council& city admin.has shoved their infill agenda down many neighbourhoods against their will. The city’s disrespect for existing property owners has ceused the pushback. Thankyou Premier
This city does not care about its residents only how much money they can screw us for
Sewer lines that were put in 70 or 80 years ago cannot handle the increased demand due to the multi unit dwellings going up in established neighborhoods! Who pays for the upgrades to the sewer system?
Edmonton Mayor Andrew Knack along with past and present city council BLATENTLY ignore city residents on Infill housing, restricting parking, widening sidewalks and useless bike lanes. I do not support the UCP but in this case they are right.
Edm council and mayors caused this, they don’t care what the residents think. Most are opposed to infill, bike lanes and the neighborhood renewals that are making it very difficult to drive in this city. The designers and planners of these projects should all be terminated and replaced with people who possess some common sense. The adminstration can’t even get the grass cut, roads fixed in timely manner and sensible snow clearing/removal. No chance they can tackle these formidable problems with any competence.
You know how much it pains me to say this: GOD BLESS DANIELLE SMITH.
(Just for today)
She is apparently capable of a FANTASTIC idea.
She has announced that the provincial government is ordering the City of Edmonton to roll back its 2024 zoning bylaws and restrict high-density infill development … because they have destroyed neighborhood character without sufficient resident buy-in (aka., while residents helplessly watched in horror as this architectural cancer spread throughout their community).
It’s too bad that she can’t order existing infills to be knocked down and their owners charged with a new form of Criminal Mischief (willfully obstructing, interrupting, or interfering with the entire neighbourhood’s enjoyment or operation of property).
I’m just sickened by them … and the wanton loss of Mid-Century, Minimal Tradition, Cape Cod Revival, and Victory Homes that’s they’ve caused. We’ll never get them back.
Thank goodness that she took it out of Knack’s hands, if he’s not going to put a stop to it.
P.s., Affordable housing? People are flipping these things for $1M
Now city council can feel how residents in mature communities feel having monstrosities ruining the character of their neighbourhoods shoved down their throats. And NO there was no choices of anyone to vote for in the last city election who’s platform included repealing bylaw 20001.
Should be building high rise apartment buildings in new areas and leave the established neighbourhood saline. Build up instead of out. Vancouver is a prime example of how to max out land for housing. Rent would probably be cheaper in high rises and you can house hundreds of people in one shot. I’ve been saying this for years to the city. Stop the infills, the immigration needs to stop and governments that dont listen to the voices Canadian born citizens need to go. Enough is enough
That Knack is hilarious “having a conversation after the decision has been made is no conversation at all” Isn’t what Knack & council have done to the citizens of Edmonton for years? Oh well more unicorn vision from Edm admin & staff. If they continue with their infill,there will be actual fights & property damage over the parking alone(I don’t think Knack understands how uninformed he is on the number of vehicles in Edm).Infill works when the fantasy 15 min city is here & thats not soon.
Thank you Premier Smith and Minister Williams!
If Knack had his way, they’d build an apartment on your front lawn, cram it full of migrants, and you’d pay for it.
Calgary held a HUGE public inquiry after Nenshi & crowd tried to push his “Packem’& Stackem'” on the citizens. The 80-90% negative response was totally ignored by the politicians. Many of whom then resigned as their mission had been accomplished. However, the next election removed the rest of them. Why did so few residents in Redmonton bother to vote? Can the province allow the city to be destroyed while the citizens awaken?
When Smith says “the right fit” she means multi occupant buildings in Wealthy areas.
Wealthy in one area and non wealthy everywhere else.
EDMONTON IS BUILDING THE SLUMS OF THE FUTUYRE. ANDREW KNACK HAS NO CONCEPT OF WHAT HE AND COUNCIL ARE DOING.
VISIT SOME OF EUROPE’S CITIES AND TAKE A LOOK AROUD, ANDREW.
The province created municipalities as the method of government. It is not working. Municipalities are becoming dictatorships ignoring democracy. Maybe it is time for the province to consider appointing local governors to run the municipalities instead.
It’s pretty bad when the premier needs to step in and act like an adult and make proper decisions. Our mayor is a toddler who needs to be capped on making stupid decisions.
Bet you he went home and cried like a B-itch after that. Those “you’re safe with me” pins really helped him
John Brennan: Municipalities power is delegated from the province. The province is in it’s lane when it overrides municipal decisions.
The irony is that this problem is because the municipalities do not listen to their people. UCP is not listening to it’s people when they try to privatize health care, or boost spending on Sheriffs.
Knack and his fellow councillors need to move out of the highrise penthouse and live on the ground floor with the rest of us.
Build your apartment buildings away from single family residences, and keep the density where it belongs. No infills! It turns nice neighbourhoods into trashy ghettos. And for the record, there is no housing shortage, this is all for the developers. There are tons of vacant apartments and “For Rent” signs everywhere.
Knack, You are uninformed and insulting! Give your head a shake! Thank you government of Alberta for stepping in
NO to infills!! Also NO to dedicated spaces for the homeless to “camp”! Couldn’t comment on that article as apparently it’s toooo sensitive of a topic and a fenty fold enabler might get their feelings hurt. Stop the madness city of Edmonton!
Nice way to wreck a city . First legalized drugs . Bring in a massive amount of immigration from third world counties. No jobs then remove houses and put 4 plex on them naking it .standing room only
How about this? If your Ward voted for infill, your Ward can have it. If your Ward didn’t, no infill for you.
Problem solvex
When are the feds stepping in stop all the mess ucepee is making?
@Harry!
The City decided, and they ignored the residents and got in bed with developers.
Unwanted infill is a disaster. Nobody wants it. It ruins the character of the established neighbourhoods and kills the existing properties values.
It only benefits drvelopers who build, cash in then leave, zero care about the added traffic, lack of parking, and declining property values.
The City then gets more tax money from the extra properties. Oh, and good luck trying to sell your home when it sits next to a three storey monstrosity with a full view of your backyard.
Knack, Knack!
Who’s there?
Common sense!
More overreach by government, let the Citys decide!
This is the mayor & council we get when only 18% of voters show up.
One thing I hope an Independent Alberta does is totally overhaul the Municipal Government Act. Currently municipalities are totally ignoring the will of the citizens. Infill when nobody wants it. Restricting building homes in the suburbs because infill is more profitable to the city. Bike lanes when the majority doesn’t want them. Tens of millions spent on consults because the city workers don’t want to do the work. And so on…
GOT TO STACK THEM PUNJABS 4 HIGH