Advertisement

WATCH: Angry citizen confronts commissioner at Elliot Lake inquiry

ABOVE: Watch a furious Elliot Lake resident interrupt an inquiry to ask who will take responsibility for the two deaths caused by the Algo Centre Mall collapse

The Elliot Lake inquiry released its findings to the public Wednesday in a wide-ranging and damning report which cast blame upon engineers, mall owners, and public officials in the northern Ontario town.

In the report, the judicial inquiry says decades of incompetence, neglect, greed and dishonesty by a succession of owners, engineers and municipal officials led to the deadly cave-in of the mall two years ago.

READ MORE: Human failure led to deadly Elliot Lake mall collapse

At the end of Commissioner Paul Belanger’s report, however, an angry resident rose to address one question still left unanswered.

“I’m wondering if I’m going to be on the green side of the grass when finally, the top people, who have caused because of his [Commissioner Belanger] statement, great arrogance in hiding the truth, be charged with the death of two people,” said the man, who identified himself as Ed.
Story continues below advertisement

It was on a sunny Saturday afternoon in June 2012 that the rooftop parking deck, weakened by decades of rust-causing water and salt penetration, finally crashed down.

Trapped in the rubble were Doloris Perizzolo, 74, and Lucie Aylwin, 37. Nineteen others were injured.

“When is [a criminal charge] going to happen?” the man continued. “Who do we have to see, sir? Do we have to go to the OPP? How long is this going to be?”
“We understand that maybe it’s three [or] four years before something gets done. I don’t know if I’ve got that kind of time. I’m 80, I’m pushing it! And I sure would like something done.”

Peter K. Doody, senior counsel for the Elliot Lake inquiry, attempted to address the man’s question.

“The reason the commission was called, the reason these commissions exist, is so as best we can…the community is told, both here in Elliot Lake and across the province is told, what happened and why it happened,” Doody said.

Story continues below advertisement

“This commission is not about criminal charges. It’s not what we’re here for. We have different rules that what would exist in a criminal case. In fact, many would say a lot more facts come out through a commission of enquiry than would ever come out through a criminal charge…we’re not, and don’t want to be seen as a criminal investigation.”

READ MORE: Key recommendations from Elliot Lake inquiry report

But the man continued to press the commission.

“So why was only one person, namely the engineer, who is fighting for his life now, is the only one the Ontario government or the Canadian government has charged?” he asked. “So who do we have to blame for all of this?”

That comment is in reference to Robert Wood, the engineer who signed off on the health of the mall just weeks before it collapsed. His work and conduct, the report found, were “markedly inferior.”

Wood, who faces criminal charges in connection with the collapse, admitted to falsifying his report to appease the owner.

“I’m sorry sir, this process can’t answer all the questions, including yours,” Doody said.

-With files from the Canadian Press

Sponsored content

AdChoices