Advertisement

Kaycee Madu says sovereignty act not a power grab, eyes changes to bill

Click to play video: 'Alberta to consider amendments to sovereignty act amid investment concerns'
Alberta to consider amendments to sovereignty act amid investment concerns
After much confusion over its constitutionality and scope, there is openness from Premier Danielle Smith and cabinet ministers to tweaking the sovereignty act. It comes as members of Alberta's business community continue to express concerns over the bill. Dan Grummett reports. – Dec 1, 2022

Alberta’s deputy premier says amendments may be needed to clear up confusion over a bill that grants Premier Danielle Smith and her cabinet unfettered power outside the legislature to rewrite laws and direct agencies to resist federal rules.

“We will consider amendment(s) to Bill 1 to clarify this to avoid confusion,” said Kaycee Madu in a series of Twitter posts on Wednesday and Thursday.

Madu said his reading of the sovereignty act indicates that cabinet does not have such power and all unilateral cabinet decisions would still have to go back to the legislature for approval.

Read more: Amid investigation, Kaycee Madu, Tyler Shandro take on new ministries in Alberta cabinet shuffle

Read next: Canadian pilots were warned of ‘untethered balloon’ amid China surveillance concerns

“It then goes through the normal cabinet process and ultimately a bill will be tabled,” wrote Madu, who is a lawyer and Alberta’s former justice minister.

Story continues below advertisement

However, the bill does not state that cabinet decisions made under the act would have to go back to the house.

Madu’s office did not return a request for comment or explanation about whether amendments are coming.

Click to play video: 'Feds ‘not looking for a fight’ over Alberta’s sovereignty act'
Feds ‘not looking for a fight’ over Alberta’s sovereignty act

Smith’s other deputy premier, Nathan Neudorf, has said he, too, believes legislative safeguards are in place but he hasn’t read the eight-page bill.

Justice Minister Tyler Shandro, who is helping Smith shepherd the bill through the house, told reporters he wasn’t aware of Madu’s comments.

He said the United Conservative Party government is listening to reaction and concerns.

Click to play video: 'Concern, confusion over scope of sovereignty act powers'
Concern, confusion over scope of sovereignty act powers

“We’re hearing the feedback on opportunities to make (the bill) more clear,” said Shandro. “No decisions have been made (on amendments).”

Story continues below advertisement

The bill, titled the Alberta Sovereignty Within a United Canada Act, was introduced Tuesday by Smith.

Smith has described it as a deliberately confrontational tool to reset the relationship with a federal government she accuses of interfering in constitutionally protected areas of provincial responsibility from energy development to health care.

Political scientists, the Opposition NDP and constitutional experts say the bill grants sweeping powers to cabinet that are normally reserved for extreme circumstances, like natural disasters, that require swift legislative action.

Read more: Alberta sovereignty act damaging to business: Calgary Chamber of Commerce

Read next: Joly looks to ‘strengthen’ Indo-Pacific Strategy partnerships during India trip

Those changes, they say, make it dangerous to democracy.

Under the bill, cabinet would decide when Ottawa is interfering in Alberta jurisdiction through a law, policy or program or through a looming federal initiative it believes may cause harm.

Cabinet would send a resolution to the legislative assembly spelling out the nature of the harm and the remedies to fix it.

If the legislature gives its approval, that is where its involvement ends and cabinet takes over.

Click to play video: '‘She wanted to deliver something that was radical’: Constitutional law expert on Alberta sovereignty act'
‘She wanted to deliver something that was radical’: Constitutional law expert on Alberta sovereignty act

The bill grants cabinet powers to unilaterally rewrite laws without sending them back to the legislature for debate or approval. Cabinet would be allowed to direct public agencies, including police, municipalities, school boards, post-secondary institutions and health regions to flout federal laws.

Story continues below advertisement

The bill gives cabinet wide latitude on how to interpret the resolution it receives from the assembly. It says cabinet “should” follow the direction of the house, but doesn’t mandate it. Instead, cabinet is told to exercise its new extraordinary powers however it deems “necessary or advisable.”

Smith and other members of her front bench are in lockstep on saying the bill stipulates direct legislative oversight over cabinet’s actions.

Read more: Smith rejects accusations her Alberta sovereignty bill is undemocratic power grab

Read next: Ottawa urges RCMP to ban use of sponge rounds, CS gas for crowd control

She repeated it in the house Thursday.

Smith also accused the Opposition NDP of “fear-mongering” that “somehow this act gives power to cabinet to unilaterally alter legislation behind closed doors, despite the fact that it does not.”

NDP Leader Rachel Notley responded, “We have heard from no less than seven different legal experts, public servants and constitutional lawyers, who confirm a simple truth: this bill gives the premier the so-called Henry VIII power to write laws behind closed doors with zero input from this assembly.”

Law professor Martin Olszynski, who has written extensively on Smith’s bill since she first proposed it in the spring, said it clearly gives cabinet unfettered power to rewrite laws. He asked why, if the bill respects the existing legislative process, as Madu contends, is it needed at all?

Story continues below advertisement
Click to play video: 'Alberta introduces sovereignty act bill. What does the proposed new legislation mean?'
Alberta introduces sovereignty act bill. What does the proposed new legislation mean?

“On its face, this is absurd,” Olszynski, with the University of Calgary, said in an interview.

Constitutional law professor Eric Adams at the University of Alberta agreed that what Madu said doesn’t square with the text of the bill.

“I can’t see anything in Section 4 (of the bill) that says the cabinet is required to table an amendment and subject it to the normal legislative process,” said Adams.

“Section 4 would seem to say the opposite.

“I’m confused by the government’s suggestions otherwise.”

Read more: Alberta sovereignty act: Municipalities, local police could get provincial directives

Read next: Marit Stiles set to officially take over as Ontario NDP leader

Smith has delivered a mixed message on how the bill would ultimately be used.

Story continues below advertisement

On Tuesday, her office sent documentation to reporters saying the government hopes to use it in the spring, but that same day she told a news conference it’s a last-resort bill and she hopes to never use it.

Indigenous leaders have criticized the bill as heavy-handed and divisive. Business groups, including the Calgary Chamber of Commerce, warn that its legal uncertainty is not good for business and investment.

Sponsored content