Advertisement

Senate urged to pass bill that would axe mandatory minimums for drug offenses

Click to play video: 'Conservatives accuse Trudeau of putting ‘his own neighbours’ at risk with Bill C-5'
Conservatives accuse Trudeau of putting ‘his own neighbours’ at risk with Bill C-5
Conservative MP Rob Moore accused Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday of “putting his own neighbours’ lives at risk” with Bill C-5, which was drafted to address “systematic racism” in the country’s justice system. But the Conservatives said this would allow violent criminals to avoid mandatory minimum sentences – May 18, 2022

Justice Minister David Lametti urged senators to pass the Liberal government’s proposed legislation on mandatory minimum penalties Wednesday, saying the bill would target the overrepresentation of Black and Indigenous people in the criminal justice system.

Twenty mandatory minimum penalties would be removed from the Criminal Code if the legislation passes, Lametti said during a hearing of the Senate’s legal and constitutional affairs committee. They were chosen because of their exaggerated impact, he said.

“We’ve picked minimum mandatory penalties that do have an impact right now on Indigenous communities, on Black communities, on racialized communities,” he said.

Read more: Liberals move to axe mandatory minimums for some drug, gun offences

Bill C-5, which passed third reading in the House of Commons in June, would amend the Criminal Code to remove mandatory minimum prison sentences for all drug convictions and for some firearms and tobacco-related offences.

Story continues below advertisement

If the Senate passes the bill and it becomes law, prosecutors would also be required to consider referring defendants to treatment programs or other support services instead of charging them for simple drug possession offences.

Lametti has argued that the changes, which reverse “tough on crime” measures passed under former Conservative prime minister Stephen Harper, would lessen the caseloads on courts.

But some senators, including Saskatchewan Conservative Denise Batters, argued that Lametti doesn’t have public support to pass the bill. “Canadians are no longer onside with your soft crime approach that’s epitomized by this bill,” she said.

Click to play video: 'Lametti defends bill to axe mandatory minimums for drug, firearm offences'
Lametti defends bill to axe mandatory minimums for drug, firearm offences

Lametti told senators during a committee hearing he is aware of the criticisms the law is “soft on crime,” but he said serious crimes would continue to have serious consequences.

“There seems to be this presumption out there that everybody gets the minimum mandatory,” he said in an interview after the committee hearing.

Story continues below advertisement

In fact, he said, judges often hand down sentences that are more severe than mandatory minimum penalties, and the Liberal government is moving to raise the maximum penalties for certain gun and gang offences under another piece of legislation focused on firearms, Bill C-21.

Other senators questioned why only some mandatory minimum sentences are being repealed.

“This is a very significant first step,” Lametti said. “It’s one that Canadians will be able to understand, and then we’ll be able to gather more data, move forward and see what the next steps should be.”

If the bill passes the Senate and becomes law, it will be Liberals’ first major reform on the file after promising to review mandatory minimums in 2015.

Read more: Iran protests: Canada’s House of Commons adopts ‘solidarity’ motion after woman’s death

It would also result in major changes to how drug possession records are dealt with in Canada.

Thanks to an NDP amendment to the bill, existing criminal records associated with simple possession charges would disappear within two years, and records created by new convictions would be expunged two years after the end of the sentence.

A previous version of the same legislation, Bill C-22, was introduced in February 2021 but died on the order paper when last fall’s federal election was called.

Story continues below advertisement

The Senate committee is expected to wrap up its study of the bill sometime this fall.

Sponsored content