Global Affairs Canada has now confirmed there are no reports of Canadian diplomats stationed in the Austrian capital experiencing symptoms of what’s become known as Havana syndrome.
The response, issued following publication of the department’s original lack of an answer, comes after the Austrian Foreign Ministry confirmed it is probing reports that American diplomats in Vienna have reported symptoms consistent with those of the mysterious illness, which first made headlines in 2017.
“There are currently no reports of Canadians in Vienna with health incidents and we continue to monitor the situation closely,” said John Babcock, spokesperson for the department, in an email on Thursday.
“We continue to stay in contact with our staff and all other relevant governments in Vienna.”
Babcock’s update came after Global News published a statement offered by the department Thursday morning which did not answer specific questions sent to them on Tuesday asking whether Canadian diplomats in Vienna had reported symptoms.
The initial response had said only that Global Affairs Canada is “engaging with our staff in Vienna and with other governments,” and that the department “maintains a strict security protocol to respond immediately to any unusual events affecting Canadian diplomats or their families posted abroad.”
However, Global Affairs Canada still has not answered several of the questions from the original query: among them, whether Canadian diplomats are being offered any additional security advice or whether the risk rating for the Canadian embassy in Vienna is under review.
Following reports of symptoms among dozens of Canadian diplomats and their families in Havana, Cuba, in 2016 and 2017, the risk rating for the embassy there was increased.
- Ottawa apologizes, announces $45M compensation for Nunavik Inuit dog slaughter
- Nations have agreed to $300B for climate funding. How will they pay for it?
- Canada Post says no ‘major breakthrough’ in talks as strike enters 2nd week
- Nova Scotia Tories appear safe with Liberals, NDP battling for second: polls
The Havana embassy was reclassified as an unaccompanied posting in 2018. That means diplomats stationed there are not allowed to bring their families with them.
A spokesperson for the Austrian Foreign Ministry said officials are in “regular contact with all diplomatic missions in Austria,” but declined to comment further on specifics.
Get weekly health news
“We are taking these reports very seriously. In accordance with our role as Host State we cooperate with the United States Authorities in their investigation,” said Gabriele Juen.
“The security of diplomats and their families sent to Austria is of the highest priority to us.”
Global Affairs Canada has said there are no new confirmed reports of Havana syndrome among Canadian diplomats since December 2018. But they have not explained why the risk rating for the embassy remains unaccompanied, or commented on their assessment of the findings of two high-profile American reports into the cause of the mystery.
The U.S. National Academies of Sciences issued a hotly awaited report in December 2020 that determined “directed, pulsed radio frequency energy appears to be the most plausible” cause for the strange, lasting symptoms reported by diplomats.
The report said there had been an “early failure” to detect and investigate the cases, which have spurred a range of theories ranging from pesticide poisoning to the malicious use of directed energy weapons by a hostile foreign actor.
While the report’s authors note they cannot say conclusively whether the pulsed energy came from a weapon or another source, “the mere consideration of such a scenario raises grave concerns about a world with disinhibited malevolent actors and new tools for causing harm to others.”
A highly redacted, declassified U.S. State Department report released under freedom of information laws in that country earlier this year said the symptoms reported by dozens of American and Canadian diplomats are the result of “targeted actions.”
That report also warned that while “the mechanism of injury, the perpetrator and the motive remain unknown,” the risks to diplomats were not over.
Though originally compiled in June 2018, the release of the declassified report in February 2021 came just two months before CNN reported on two separate incidents in late 2020 that occurred near the White House and affected staffers working on the National Security Council.
Global News reported in May 2021 that a letter sent on behalf of nine Canadian diplomats and their families to Foreign Affairs Minister Marc Garneau said there were “at least three” additional cases in Canadians in 2019 and 2020.
That letter alleged that Global Affairs Canada has taken the decision to no longer disclose new cases.
That followed reporting by Global News that three more individuals are joining the $28-million lawsuit launched by Canadian diplomats and their families over lasting neurological symptoms alleged to have been sustained while serving in Havana, and which they say continue years later.
The government has repeatedly refused to provide clear answers to questions from Global News over the last year on dozens of aspects of its handling of the reports of strange symptoms among diplomats.
Officials have not also addressed why bureaucrats warned diplomats bound for Cuba in 2017 to stay silent about mysterious symptoms being reported among staff at the embassy in Havana — and what is being done now to protect Canadian diplomats still abroad.
The mystery began in late 2016 and early 2017 when American diplomatic staff at the embassy in Havana began reporting unusual symptoms similar to those from a concussion: hearing loss, memory loss, tinnitus, nosebleeds, vision problems and vertigo, among others.
Canadian diplomatic staff and their families began reporting symptoms in early 2017 and into the following year, with more than 40 Canadian and American diplomats and their families impacted.
But nearly four years after the onset of the mystery, there are no official answers and the Canadian government is fighting 15 of those Canadians impacted in court, arguing the plaintiffs have made “exaggerated” claims.
Comments