Advertisement

Jury finds Halifax special constables guilty of criminal negligence in death of Corey Rogers

Click to play video: 'Jury finds Halifax special constables guilty of criminal negligence in death of Corey Rogers'
Jury finds Halifax special constables guilty of criminal negligence in death of Corey Rogers
WATCH: A Nova Scotia jury has ruled that two special constables are guilty of criminal negligence in the death of an impaired 41-year-old man who suffocated in a Halifax police jail cell – Nov 10, 2019

This story contains graphic images. Discretion is advised. 

A Nova Scotia jury has ruled that two special constables are guilty of criminal negligence in the death of an impaired 41-year-old man who suffocated in a Halifax police jail cell.

The jury of eight men and four women found that Const. Daniel Fraser and Const. Cheryl Gardner caused the death of Corey Rogers on June 16, 2016.

Under the Criminal Code of Canada, criminal negligence is defined as completing or omitting any duty in a way that shows “wanton or reckless disregard” for the lives or safety of others.

Click to play video: 'Nova Scotia jury deliberates in case of constables charged in jail cell death'
Nova Scotia jury deliberates in case of constables charged in jail cell death

The verdict came on the third day of jury deliberations.

Story continues below advertisement

READ MORE: Nova Scotia jury deliberates in case of constables charged in jail cell death

Jeannette Rogers, the mother of Corey Rogers, said she was thrilled with the verdict on Sunday.

“Oh my God, thank God,” said Rogers outside the courtroom, moments after the verdict. “It’s been a long, long road. But at least now we’re finally where we need to be.”

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Get daily National news

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Corey Rogers was in custody for being drunk in a public place after he rapidly downed a 375-millilitre bottle of Fireball whisky outside a children’s hospital the day after his child was born.

He was carried into booking by the arresting officers who laid him on the floor at about 11 p.m. on June 15.

Const. Cheryl Gardner had told the jury that she had dealt with Corey Rogers previously and had seen through the booking process that Rogers was intoxicated and was wearing a spit hood over his mouth because he had been uncooperative with the arresting officers.

Gardner told the court that based on what she observed and was told by the officer, she determined that Rogers was fit to be taken to a cell.

Click to play video: 'Corey Rogers’ mother says Halifax police failed her son'
Corey Rogers’ mother says Halifax police failed her son

The jury viewed video of Rogers heaving in the cell while wearing the spit hood, a mask that prevents prisoners from spitting on guards.

Story continues below advertisement

An autopsy found the inmate had vomited into the mask, and he died from suffocation.

Gardner testified she had never read the instructions that come wrapped in the packaging for the spit hoods.

Crown prosecutor Chris Vanderhooft pointed out that the packaging clearly warns the improper use of the hood could cause injury or death if the prisoner is left alone.

READ MORE: Officer says she noticed nothing unusual with Corey Rogers, who died in Halifax jail cell

Both Gardner and Fraser said police booking officers lacked the resources to carry out so-called “Four R” observation checklist, which includes rousing the prisoner, checking their response to questions, assessing their response to commands and remembering to take into account the possibility of other illnesses.

The Crown alleged the peace officers failed to follow those steps.

The defence has said the constables followed the usual procedures and had believed Rogers was asleep rather than unconscious.

Halifax police to ‘review’ decision

The defence team didn’t offer a comment, but Vanderhooft said he wouldn’t speculate on what kind of sentence he expects the booking officers will receive but will instead wait for the sentence report.

Story continues below advertisement

“The maximum available sentence is life in prison, we’re certainly not going to be seeking that,” said Vanderhooft. “And there’s no minimum sentence prescribed by law for this offense so, we’ll determine once we get the presentence report and once we’ve done the research, what sentence we’re going to seek.”

Halifax Regional Police issued a statement shortly after the verdict was delivered saying they would “review the court’s decision and determine next steps.”

“Out of respect for the court process, and as this matter remains the subject of ongoing processes, it would be inappropriate to further comment on the decision.”

Sentencing has been scheduled for Feb. 14, 2020.

Fraser and Gardner remain out on conditions and were not taken into custody.

With files from The Canadian Press and Jesse Thomas

Sponsored content

AdChoices