Advertisement

Trump would face felony charges if he wasn’t president, hundreds of former prosecutors say

Click to play video: 'Trump says Mueller should not testify about report, investigation'
Trump says Mueller should not testify about report, investigation
WATCH ABOVE: Trump says Mueller should not testify about report, investigation – May 6, 2019

WASHINGTON – Nearly 400 former federal prosecutors have signed onto a letter saying President Donald Trump would have been charged with obstruction of justice if he were anyone other than the president.

The letter was signed by more than 370 former Justice Department prosecutors who served under both Democratic and Republican administrations. It was released Monday by Protect Democracy, an advocacy group formed two years ago that is critical of the Trump administration.

The former prosecutors say special counsel Robert Mueller’s report “describes several acts that satisfy all of the elements for an obstruction charge.”

Those actions include Trump’s efforts to have Mueller fired; Trump’s attempts to limit the scope of the Russia investigation; and Trump’s tweets and public statements aimed at discouraging aides from co-operating with prosecutors.

Story continues below advertisement

WATCH: AG Barr was ‘surprised’ Mueller didn’t reach a decision on obstruction

Click to play video: 'Barr: I was surprised Mueller didn’t reach a decision on obstruction'
Barr: I was surprised Mueller didn’t reach a decision on obstruction

“In our system, every accused person is presumed innocent and it is always the government’s burden to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt,” the letter states.

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Get daily National news

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

“But, to look at these facts and say that a prosecutor could not probably sustain a conviction for obstruction of justice – the standard set out in Principles of Federal Prosecution – runs counter to logic and our experience.”

Mueller examined nearly a dozen acts by the president for potential obstruction of justice. He ultimately reached no conclusion on whether Trump had criminally obstructed justice, citing in part an opinion from the department’s Office of Legal Counsel that says a sitting president cannot be indicted.

Story continues below advertisement

WATCH: Democrats want to hear directly from Robert Mueller

Click to play video: 'Democrats want to hear directly from Robert Mueller'
Democrats want to hear directly from Robert Mueller

Attorney General William Barr and Deputy Attorney Rod Rosenstein then stepped in and determined Mueller’s evidence was insufficient for an obstruction charge. Trump has used that finding to claim that the report found no obstruction. But the ex-prosecutors make clear that in their view the evidence leans heavily in the other direction.

“We believe strongly that, but for the OLC memo, the overwhelming weight of professional judgment would come down in favour of prosecution for the conduct outlined in the Mueller Report,” it says.

Sponsored content

AdChoices