Advertisement

Hearing underway for Bassam Al-Rawi, former Halifax taxi driver accused of sexual assault

Former taxi driver Bassam Al-Rawi arrives at provincial court in Halifax on Monday, Jan. 7, 2019 for his trial on a charge of sexual assault. The Canadian Press/Andrew Vaughan

A preliminary inquiry got underway Monday in the case of a former Halifax taxi driver accused of sexual assault.

Bassam Al-Rawi is accused in an alleged 2012 incident.

Police had decided in March 2013 there was insufficient evidence to charge him, but they took another look at the file in 2017 and decided there were grounds for a sexual assault charge.

READ MORE: Halifax taxi driver Bassam Al-Rawi’s sex assault trial adjourned after four days of evidence

There is a publication ban in place on evidence presented at the preliminary inquiry, which began Monday in Halifax provincial court before Judge Amy Sakalauskas.

The hearing will continue Tuesday, when Crown and defence lawyers are expected to make submissions.

Story continues below advertisement

Al-Rawi is also facing a retrial on a charge of sexual assault in connection with a separate incident in May 2015.

Breaking news from Canada and around the world sent to your email, as it happens.

He was charged in the 2015 incident after an unconscious woman was found in the back seat of a cab naked from the waist down.

Al-Rawi’s retrial was ordered after an acquittal was overturned in January 2018 by the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal.

The retrial got underway last month, and is expected to continue April 15.

The acquittal, after the judge found there was no evidence of lack of consent, drew national attention.

WATCH: Sexual assault charges lead to calls for more female drivers

Click to play video: 'Sexual assault charges lead to calls for more female drivers'
Sexual assault charges lead to calls for more female drivers

Judge Gregory Lenehan’s comment in his decision that “clearly, a drunk can consent” sparked a debate over intoxication and the capacity to consent to sex.

Story continues below advertisement

An independent judicial review committee last year dismissed several complaints against Lenehan, saying it found no evidence of impermissible reasoning or bias in his ruling.

But the appeal court ordered a new criminal trial, saying Lenehan erred in law by finding there was no evidence of lack of consent.

Sponsored content

AdChoices