Advertisement

US takes hard line on NAFTA talks, but Canada is confident going forward: Freeland

Click to play video: 'U.S. opens NAFTA Negotiations with tough talk'
U.S. opens NAFTA Negotiations with tough talk
WATCH: The first round of NAFTA renegotiations are now underway between Canada, the U.S. And Mexico. There's a broad agreement on the need to modernize the trade deal, but the U.S. said today it wants much more than just a tweak. Ines del le Cuetara reports – Aug 16, 2017

The United States drew a hard line for renegotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement on Wednesday, demanding major concessions aimed at slashing U.S. trade deficits with Mexico and Canada and boosting U.S. content for autos.

At the start of talks in Washington, U.S. President Donald Trump’s top trade adviser, Robert Lighthizer, said Trump was not interested in “a mere tweaking” of the 23-year-old pact, which Trump has threatened to scrap without major changes.

“We feel that NAFTA has fundamentally failed many, many Americans and needs major improvement,” Lighthizer, the U.S. trade representative, said in an opening statement that reflected Trump’s relentless criticism that NAFTA has caused massive U.S. manufacturing job losses.

Lighthizer put Mexico and Canada on notice that the United States would use its clout as their biggest export customer to wring concessions, saying the United States wanted substantially tougher rules of origin, including a requirement of “substantial U.S. content” for autos.

Story continues below advertisement

He also signaled a fight over NAFTA’s trade dispute settlement system for changes that would allow more anti-dumping duties against Canada and Mexico, saying this provision should “respect our national sovereignty.”

Canadian Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland suggested earlier this week that her country could walk away if the United States insisted on scrapping the “Chapter 19” trade dispute settlement system that requires the use of binational panels.

In her opening statement, Freeland took a swipe at the U.S. fixation on cutting its trade deficits, saying: “Canada does not view trade surpluses or deficits as a primary measure of whether a trading relationship works.

Get expert insights, Q&A on markets, housing, inflation, and personal finance information delivered to you every Saturday.

Get weekly money news

Get expert insights, Q&A on markets, housing, inflation, and personal finance information delivered to you every Saturday.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

U.S.-Canada-Mexico trade has quadrupled since NAFTA took effect in 1994, surpassing $1 trillion in 2015.

Story continues below advertisement

MEXICO: NAFTA HAS TO “WORK FOR ALL PARTIES”

Lighthizer blamed NAFTA for a direct loss of 700,000 U.S. manufacturing jobs since the pact took effect in 1994, a period that coincides with increasing automation across all industries that has allowed more output with fewer workers.

Auto industry groups have warned against changing the pact’s rules of origin, which govern how much of a product’s components must originate from NAFTA countries. They said the pact has allowed them to build a competitive North American supply base that has helped boost exports of U.S.-assembled vehicles globally.

WATCH: Rex Tillerson comments on violence in Virginia during bilateral meeting with Chrystia Freeland ahead of NAFTA talks

Click to play video: 'Tillerson comments on violence in Virginia during bilateral meeting with Chrystia Freeland'
Tillerson comments on violence in Virginia during bilateral meeting with Chrystia Freeland

The pact also has massively boosted U.S. farm income by increasing agricultural exports to both Mexico and Canada.

Story continues below advertisement

“We do not want them to use us as a trading tool and to do harm to the agricultural sector in all three countries,” the president of the American Farm Bureau Federation, Zippy Duvall, told a news conference on Wednesday.

Corporate chief executives have been sounding “do no harm” warnings on NAFTA for months.

The long list of U.S. demands could make it difficult for negotiators to reach agreement on modernization plans that also are expected to include new chapters on digital and energy trade, and environmental, labor and currency standards.

Both Freeland and Mexican Economy Minister Ildefonso Guajardo pushed back at the U.S. demands and defended NAFTA.

Story continues below advertisement

Guajardo said NAFTA should be modernized to produce more trade among its participants, not less, and needed more than one winner.

“For a deal to be successful, it has to work for all parties involved. Otherwise, it is not a deal,” Guajardo said.

Guajardo later told a news conference that it was “too soon” for the three countries to begin narrowing their differences. He said it was not a good idea to add country-specific content requirements to the agreement.

Mexico is keen to maintain preferential access for its goods and services to the United States and Canada, where nearly 85 percent of its exports are shipped. Its NAFTA priorities also include greater integration of the continent’s labor markets and energy sectors.

WATCH: Canadian companies hopes NAFTA talks don’t go south. 
Click to play video: 'Canadian company hopes NAFTA talks don’t go south'
Canadian company hopes NAFTA talks don’t go south

Weighing heavily over the talks is the 2018 Mexico presidential election. Mexico has urged all sides to complete the negotiations before the campaign ramps up in February to avoid having them become a political punching bag.

Story continues below advertisement

Canadian and Mexican delegations were not surprised by Lighthizer’s tough talk.

Raymond Bachand, the lead trade negotiator for the Canadian province of Quebec, said he was not worried by Lighthizer’s remarks that the United States would not accept minor changes to the agreement.

“Mr Lighthizer’s speech was very focused on U.S. domestic policy. President Trump promised to renegotiate NAFTA,” Bachand said. “There’s a lot of strategizing going on today because it’s clear that U.S. business circles have one objective – do no harm,” he told reporters.

Sponsored content

AdChoices