The Liberal government is significantly boosting federal spending in an attempt to draw in business investment and address the affordability struggles of Canadians just days after Prime Minister Mark Carney said that the world is becoming “more dangerous and divided.”
It’s a document experts say is both “ambitious” and “risky” amid significant global unknowns and volatility that has left consumers struggling with the soaring cost of just about everything.
Carney’s sophomore budget commits an additional $151 billion over five years in “supports” for Canadian households, businesses and other levels of government.
That money is entirely taken from better-than-expected government fiscal projections, both higher than expected revenues and tightened government operational spending, which gave Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne $158 billion to play with the planning horizon.
The decision to use the windfall for spending gave the government room to take some big fiscal swings while keeping the deficits relatively stable at $62.3 billion in 2026-27 and declining over the five-year spending plan.
“With solid revenue growth, and (a) shift towards capital investment and clear strategies, we are in a position to transform our economy towards stronger growth and productivity,” Champagne said in his budget speech Thursday.
“Economic growth gives us the means. Our plan is to turn that growth into greater opportunity, greater security, and a better life for all.”
Champagne is selling the budget as built around three broad pillars: boosting business investment, addressing the affordability crunch, and defending Canadian sovereignty while celebrating shared heritage.
To attract private sector investment, the government is strategy is centered on a productivity “mega deduction,” which allows businesses to immediately deduct the full cost of new investments, the Canada Growth Incentive to encourage entrepreneurs to reinvest capital gains into new businesses, and billions toward research and development.
Taken together, the government is calling these an “investment supercycle.” The hope is to both boost Canadian business investment while attracting $1 trillion in foreign direct investment over the coming years.
Jimmy Jean, the chief economist with the Desjardins Group, characterized the budget as “risky” but said it’s clear that the government is leaning heavily into the push to drum up investment and grow the economy.
“Really they’re going all in on this. So very ambitious,” said Jean.
“But if they don’t execute, then, it means that our debt metrics will have considerably deteriorated and it will be up to a workforce that is aging to support all of that into the future … There’s a lot at stake in terms of the execution part of it.”
Taken together, the government is spending $67 billion on various initiatives aimed at enticing investment and strengthening the economy.
The budget comes just two days after the U.S. midterm elections that saw voters deliver a stark rebuke to the administration south of the border over the soaring cost of living caused by the war in Iran and the trade war, as well as growing global unrest in India, France, Italy, and multiple European countries over deteriorating public services and prospects for youth.
The budget includes multiple consumer and affordability measures including changes to simplify the tax system for individuals and businesses, multiple new tax credits, raising the limit on consumer savings covered by CDIC insurance from $100,000 to $250,000, making the Canada Strong Pass permanent, making museum admission free for those under 25, allowing the intergenerational farm transfer to be used for nieces and nephews, and enhancing the Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit, which would boost the benefit by $339 for a single person and up to $679 for a couple with two children.
The government is also boosting the Nutrition North program by $610 million over five years to address astronomical food costs for northern Canadian communities, and making the federal caregiver credit fully refundable.
Get daily National news
Still, the amount allocated on affordability measures is comparatively small, Jean says.
“It seems like, affordability is more treated from the lens of what they are provided for: for groceries or for rebates. Certainly, they extend some of that, but they’re not going much further in terms of, addressing some of the still-acute cost of living issues many Canadians are dealing with,” Jean said.
- Online gambling more than doubles among young Montreal men, study finds
- Kelowna woman calls for action on public safety in wake of frightening attack
- Tenants upset with squalid conditions at central Edmonton apartment building
- Separatism referendum cost $84 million, exceeded Elections Alberta budget
By far the biggest change in this year’s budget is that the government is providing hard figures on their plans to dramatically increase defence spending. After years of lagging behind, Canada hit the NATO target of spending two per cent of GDP on defence this year. Carney has committed to upping that to five per cent of GDP by 2035.
Based on government’s plan Thursday, core defence spending will increase from $75.1 billion in 2026-27 to $99.2 billion in 2030-31 — making defence, along with Old Age Security and debt service charges, among the most significant line items in the federal budget.
While it’s mentioned throughout the document, trade tensions with the U.S. — the single largest political issue of Carney’s prime ministership so far —is not a central focus of the budget document. In fact, the document opens by noting that the economic headwinds created by Donald Trump’s trade war have been largely offset by stronger-than-expected economic performance to start 2026.
But Kevin Page with the Institute for Fiscal Studies and Democracy said the government’s highlighting of its fiscal position does not take tell the full story.
While deficit numbers remain relatively stable over the budget’s planning horizon, Page noted, the federal government’s financial requirements — including loans and investments — is significantly higher. The cost of servicing the federal debt is likewise increasing over the budget’s planning horizon.
That’s going to reduce the federal government’s room to maneuver in future years, Page warned.
“We know finance ministers and cabinet ministers that are looking to fund new initiatives going forward, they’re going to have less and less fiscal room because the fastest (growing) spending component is interest on the public debt,” Page said in an interview.
In a social media post Thursday, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre blasted the spending plan as a “credit card budget.” The new debt will lead to “higher inflation and interest today and higher taxes tomorrow,” he said.
“Canadians will pay more for food, fuel, and homes. Budget should be named Mastered by Debt,” Poilievre posted, playing off the budget’s “Masters of our Destiny” title.
NDP Leader Avi Lewis described the budget as “Christmas came early for the billionaires.”
“I know what they were going for with the ‘masters of our destiny:’ a kind of old school, colonial, pioneer spirit. When I think about the masters of our destiny detailed in the policies and budget, I think of the masters of the universe investors of prime minister’s investment summit.”
“Budgets are expressions of a government’s priorities. The single biggest item in this entire budget is a $36 billion mega-deduction. That’s not what Canadians are experiencing as a crisis in the economy today. Where is the mega deduction for my grocery? Where is the mega deduction on my cell phone bill, on my rent or mortgage?” Lewis added.
In his budget speech, Champagne noted that Canada has seen “what happens around the world when governments lose their fiscal room to manoeuvre.”
“Choices become harder,” Champagne’s speech read.
Speaking to reporters Thursday afternoon, Champagne downplayed concerns over debt servicing costs — noting that things aren’t as bad as in the late 1980s, when the Canadian government was in a fiscal crisis that led to massive cuts to public spending in the early 1990s.
Maybe Canadians could afford the things they need and want if this government would stop taxing us to death and giving the money away to foreign countries and useless special interest groups that nobody asked for? Perhaps Canadians would also be better off if they invested in us and trained everyone instead of replacing them with immigrants? Maybe if the government also cracked down on companies that underpay workings for hard jobs?
Carney will be flying to Paris next week followed by a week in the Caribbean to discuss trade with the Liberal Party Budget
Prior to the Reign of Prince Blackface things were pretty good. Then the virtue signaling spending began .
@Dc Dreaming for handouts?
Rule of thumb : in order for social programs to happen , income needs to happen
The LPC doesn’t generate income , it curtails it through all kinds of taxes and regulations that don’t take “ seniors and low
income people into account “
Elbows up
Hope they will be acceptable in lieu of the handouts you’re expecting
You get what you vote for !
Oh look Liberal opens mouth , dollar drops again , more “FREE” giveaways! All this does is fuels inflation .
Time for some real hard choices for these dimwits …..STOP SPENDING!
When is the next federal election?
Seniors and low income citizens get nothing again.
This budget will pour more money down the drain just like the Liberals Powerco (Volkswagen) battery plant federal investment $13.5 billion now on hold until 2029 never going to happen where’s that money gone ???
Canada’s debt is now 1.3 trillion
Half of it accumulated the past 6 years
That’s all I have to say
Basically the Carney/Champagne budget philosophy is this ….. I am expecting to win the lottery next year (because I buy a ticket every week) so I will use my credit cards to spend that million dollars and pay it off when (if) I win the lottery. Not to worry about the interest rate charged on the million dollars, I will just get another credit card to pay that. THAT my fellow Canadians is THE whole policy from the Carney/Champagne budget.
Nothing about taking money from Pensions?
Crickets….
Global deleted this reasonable comment. Let’s see if they do it again
“But if they don’t execute, then, it means that our debt metrics will have considerably deteriorated and it will be up to a workforce that is aging to support all of that into the future …“
Which means their budget predictions must be successful or we are all up the creek without a paddle, with an even bigger anchor of debt around our necks. One that will be even more expensive to service, taking more taxes every day just to service it. Increased taxes and inflation will be the result and we Canadians will be stuck with it while Carney just walks away like he did in the UK.
“Masters of our destiny” budget !!! More like a sci fi movie script every time they open their mouths. The pie in the sky predictions that have to come to fruition or we are toast, seem more like fiction than reality.
One thing is certain about Carney’s budget and that is he certainly has mastered the art of squandering other people’s money.
Fool me once shame you
Fool me twice, shame on me
Fool me 3, 4, 5 times. Elbows Up Canadian
Andrew Coyne of G&M totally torched Carneys budget. Called it mediocre and not ambitious at all.
oas should at least be
$1200.00 per month
Champagne promised lower grocery prices by Thanksgiving 2023. He didn’t deliver.
Liberals in a nutshell. Performative ambition with no results or positive outcomes of any kind.
I hope there is a major boost in OAS for seniors in this budget. If there isn”t Canada will have a major numbers of low income seniors homeless and living on the streets of every city in Canada
$339 divided by 365 days =.92 cents for our groceries each day! Wow! Won’t need Wegovy!!!
Wasn’t Carneys budget last year “ambitious” but yet very little was achieved.
Elboz up. Pathetic attempt at a budget. Once again. Billion and billions to flow
Out of Canada when Canadians need that money. Pathetic
So the federal government over taxed the Citizens of Canada. That lets them spend more? How about debt reduction, which would lead to even lower taxes.
Where is the money going? To foreign companies so they can buy out Canadian companies.
So basically the same group that somehow doubled our 155 year debt in only 10 years.Spending 650 billion on next to nothing,pushed business away.This same group is hoping to entice business with another half a trillion.These people are incompetent . We actually don’t need more money for the arts and to tell us how great Canada is,because it isn’t ,because of these Liberals.Dont buy us with our own money you crooks.
At this point its not even worth trying to reason with liberal voters. They just keep pretending the issue isnt there
What are these fools on? Homelessness, drug/foodbank usage up in numbers never seen before. Unemployment numbers rising weekly, specifically in metals production, and their answer is to buy more from China. Send in the dancing bears, these clowns are unbearable! Youth depression up, family violence is through the roof. EVERYTHING is so expensive because of their carbon, plastic, and packaging taxes. Canadians can’t take this much longer. Something’s gotta give, enough already!!!
Middle class and Seniors get fucked again.
Largest waste . WHO IN AN OPERATION GOVERMENT SPENDS TO GET INVESTMENT. Goverment funds meaning buddies will try to compete.
So we still cant afford to pay our bills.
Not really a.surprise given how pathetically easy it is to manipulate Canadians