Delegates from a First Nation along British Columbia’s coast will lobby an international maritime body headquartered in the United Kingdom to change the compensation formula for oil spills.
Chief Marilyn Slett, elected chief of the Heiltsuk Nation in northwestern B.C., will be in London on Tuesday to address the International Maritime Organization, a specialized agency of the United Nations.
The IMO sets global standards for the safety, security and environmental performance of international shipping, and Slett says she will ask the organization’s legal committee to include Indigenous cultural losses.
Slett points specifically to the events that happened almost exactly a decade ago, when the tug Nathan E. Stewart hauling a tank barge ran aground some 10 nautical miles west of Bella Bella, B.C.
The hull of the tug eventually breached, releasing about 110,000 litres of diesel oil into the environment. The tug eventually sank, but crews managed to recover the barge.
Slett says the spill resulted in the loss of a site of knowledge transmission and of high cultural value, and the incident showed that maritime laws covering oil spills were made without Indigenous peoples and without a mechanism for compensating them for their cultural losses.
“So, it goes really to the fabric of our way of life,” she says. “We are deeply connected to our territory. Our culture comes alive in our lands and in our waters, and this spill took that away, and will never be the same again.”
Slett, who will be in the United Kingdom from April 13 to 17, will also speak to Canada’s High Commissioner in the United Kingdom, former federal Liberal cabinet minister Bill Blair, to follow up on previous discussions with Blair’s predecessor Ralph Goodale.
Get daily National news
She says the delegates will be pointing to Canada’s status as a signatory of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and its presence on the legal committee, as reasons for supporting their advocacy.
The IMO’s legal committee has representatives from all 176 states that are full members of the organization, including Canada.
Defining Indigenous cultural losses is not straightforward, however.
“That’s a really big question, and it’s very broad, because it’s really about how we are as healthy people,” Slett says, adding she hasn’t heard anything concrete from Canada, and that the process itself could take a long time given global complexities.
“It’s going to be a process, but we are also committed to making sure that our voices are heard,” she says.
Damage from the barge spill might still be ongoing.
The Heiltsuk Nation says in a statement it is still waiting for compensation and restoration work from the spill to commence, with over $23 million in estimated recovery costs.
The statement specifically points to what it calls “a recent explosion” in the population of invasive European green crabs. They are “now threatening to wipe out the clam fishery,” it says.
This will be Slett’s second trip to London to lobby for changes. She says she went there two years ago and met with some of the member countries, including Australia, New Zealand, and Brazil.
- Opening of new bike lanes in northwest Calgary sparks intense debate
- Greater access to private medical testing in Alberta under proposed legislation
- Canada’s labour ministers agree to ‘harmonize’ some workplace safety standards
- Legislation to suspend parts of DRIPA won’t be a confidence vote, B.C. gov’t says
Her trip also comes almost exactly three months after she and other leaders of coastal First Nations met with Prime Minister Mark Carney in Prince Rupert, B.C., to reiterate their opposition to a memorandum of understanding between Ottawa and Alberta signed last fall.
That agreement includes language that could lead to a pipeline carrying bitumen from northern Alberta to B.C.’s northern coast for shipping to Asian markets.
Carney has also said that the pipeline will not happen without a private proponent under the agreement, which has set July 1 as the deadline for Alberta to submit a proposal to Ottawa’s Major Projects Office for review.
Any future pipeline would also require changes to the federal tanker ban which prohibits oil tankers carrying more than 12,500 metric tons of crude oil or persistent oil products as cargo from stopping, loading, or unloading at ports or marine installations along B.C.’s northern coast.
The area runs from the Canada-U.S. border in the north, down to the point on British Columbia’s mainland across from the northern tip of Vancouver Island, and includes Haida Gwaii.
Slett says she and other First Nation leaders continue to monitor the situation around the MOU between Ottawa and Alberta and says First Nation leaders acknowledged that Carney has “prioritized building a resilient economy.”
She says they have also told him they would like to work with him on shared priorities. But without a resilient economy, she says First Nations cannot protect their way of life.
“There’s a lot of things that we can do,” she says. “But we depend on a healthy ecosystem and a healthy ocean for our sustenance, for our way of life, and also for our economy.”
“How can we trust Canada on a new pipeline, when Canada has failed to adequately respond to previous spills? We are reaching 10 years of the Nathan E. Stewart (event) and we are still pushing for justice,” she says.
“That’s a long time and adding super tankers on the top of the existing traffic is not something we will ever support.”
NF – Awww are you upset because I speak the truth about “White people” and “Colonizers”? The truth hurts hey buddy. I’m just here to remind you that Canada is no longer accepting the fabrication and lies that were written in the history books of Canada. Disease, Genocide, Mass murder, Prejudice, Sexual Violence towards First Nations people. There’s your white history my friend
So did she canoe to London like the “old ways” ?.
JV – “Bob – Looks like you’re the one getting triggered buddy. All you do is spew your hatred filled posts highlighting you ignorance and prejudice.”
I see JV in a lot of these comment sections spewing hatred for the “White people” or “Colonizers” as he would say. It’s interesting that reconciliation is only seen as a one-way street. Both parties need to work together to reconcile.
Interesting that JV always reduces everything to name calling…
Bob – Even a child has a better understanding of the English language than you do jackass. Seriously are you drunk?
Bob – “Is that all got” 🤣🤣🤣
Is that all got JV. Autofill and Spell Check correction. You are such a child.
I haven’t said anything ignorant or racist towards minorities in months… Oh wait that’s because I’m dead. Oh well 🤷🏻
tired of it all, piss off
Thanks man. Tool is my favorite band🤘🤘
Jv
Your a tool bud lol
Bob – What’s that about a clam? What? 🤷🏻😂 What a f**cking idiot
Bob – “Yeah I guess I can that” haha what? Yeah big IQ move there buddy. You’re so triggered you can’t even put a proper sentence together 🤣🤣🤣
Wait JV I’ll correct myself. Yeah I guess I can that FN have knowledge transmission with something like a clam. There is so much in common there. Bottom feeders, IQ, evolutionary development. Makes a lot of sense.
Bob – Looks like you’re the one getting triggered buddy. All you do is spew your hatred filled posts highlighting you ignorance and prejudice. Nothing based on reality. Only a racist idiot like you would claim victory in a court battle that hasn’t even begun yet. Actually they’ve already started the court cases in Alberta and so far the First Nations chiefs are winning
JV triggered much? I am pretty sure I understand the situation. Wink
I am pretty sure I would understand the evidence if they could actually present some.
But like yourself here and like what just happened last week, you and FN just resort to insults and claims of racism without actually providing any physical evidence or support the claims.
All I did was ask for proof and you provided none.
Case closed! 😜
Bob – Just because you’re too stupid to understand something doesn’t make it irrelevant. Just like you whitebread idiots are too stupid to pronounce the name of the new bridge in Surrey. Even little kids can pronounce it 🤣🤣🤣
Simple Answer: no.
“ the loss of a site of knowledge transmission and of high cultural value” Huh? Knowledge Transmission? What the F does that mean. Please explain in detail how that site is any different from the 25,000km of other coastline in BC. This is just more made up nonsense to justify yet another money grab. In recent years (the last fifty) I bet there is not one scrape of proof of this site’s additional cultural value. Just more vague and unprovable “oral history” about its importance.
When will the white nationalists in BC and Alberta understand that they do not have any say in the United Nations. This is just another example of why we need UNDRIP. They also have no say in any First Nations affairs. As BC Citizens, they can complain to their provincial MP. As a Canadian Citizen they can complain to their MP. But they need to reconcile to facts.
When will the Native tribes understand that they do not have any say in the United Nations. This is just another example of why we need to get out from under UNDRIP. They also have no say in a pipeline. As BC Citizens, they can complain to their provincial MP. As a Canadian Citizen they can complain to their MP. But they need to reconcile to facts.
***BILLIONS
Maybe…..MAYBE…..firnat would have an iota of credibility if they would (could) account for the billion of taxpayer dollars they have squandered, mismanaged, and outright stolen.
Find Online Jobs (500$-6000$ Weekly) safe and secure! Easy Acces To Information. Simple in use. All the Answers. Multiple sources combined. Fast and trusted. Discover us now! Easy & Fast, 99% Match..
.
Follow Here ………Www.PayAtHome1.Com