Menu

Topics

Connect

Comments

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.

Saskatchewan teachers discuss binding arbitration in consultation process

WATCH: As teachers continue their work-to-rule this week, there is a lot of uncertainty for support programs. As Global's Nicole Healey reports, after-school organizations say they're dealing with staffing issues. – Jun 12, 2024

The Saskatchewan Teachers’ Federation says it is undergoing a member consultation process regarding the use of binding arbitration to reach a new provincial collective bargaining agreement.

Story continues below advertisement

Much of the information around the consultation process isn’t being shared by the Saskatchewan Teachers’ Federation (STF) while the process is underway, but said it focused on two possible paths forward.

“One of which involves the use of binding arbitration to resolve two outstanding issues: class complexity-accountability framework and teachers’ wages,” the STF release said.

The STF said the Government-Trustee Bargaining Committee revised its offer on June 8 to include a class complexity-accountability framework and wages.

Story continues below advertisement

Global News reached out to the Ministry of Education asking if the binding arbitration offer had been revised, but was told through a statement that it had not.

The daily email you need for Saskatoon's top news stories.

“There is no new binding arbitration offer. Government has and continues to offer binding arbitration on matters of wages and an accountability framework/classroom supports. Binding arbitration represents the best path forward that will provide certainty to parents, students, and families,” the ministry said.

Saskatchewan teachers and the provincial government have been in bargaining talks for over a year, with discussions first starting in May 2023.

The STF had offered binding arbitration as a means to resolve this bargaining dispute in March, but was instead presented the government’s final offer.

After turning down the final offer, the provincial government came back at the end of May offering binding arbitration.

Binding arbitration would involve a submission of the dispute to a neutral party, which would provide a middle ground to the province and the union.

Story continues below advertisement

In May, Education Minister Jeremy Cockrill claimed that both sides of the bargaining table felt comfortable with the last tentative agreement and that good progress was made.

He said that binding arbitration is a process outside of traditional bargaining and that details around it would need to be hashed out between the two sides.

An arbitration board would be created with a single member from each bargaining committee who will appoint a mutually agreeable chair.

Advertisement

You are viewing an Accelerated Mobile Webpage.

View Original Article