Menu

Topics

Connect

Comments

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.

New N.S. coastal protection plan shifts responsibility to homeowners, municipalities

A recent reversal in Nova Scotia's strategy to address coastal erosion is generating plenty of criticism.Experts project the greatest rates of relative sea-level rise will be along the Atlantic Coast. Some are questioning the provincial government's new approach. Heidi Petracek explains what is at stake – Mar 10, 2024

Nova Scotia’s new plan to protect the province’s 13,000 kilometres of coastline is an abdication of the government’s responsibility, the opposition and environmental activists said Monday.

Story continues below advertisement

The strong criticism came swiftly after Environment Minister Tim Halman announced the strategy and confirmed that the Progressive Conservative government would not put into force the Coastal Protection Act, which was passed in 2019 by the Liberals with support from all parties in the legislature.

The act would have offered more protection to coastal areas such as dunes and salt marshes, and would have restricted development along parts of the coastline at risk of heavy erosion.

Instead, the government’s new plan shifts much of the responsibility for coastal protection to individual property owners and municipalities.

“They’ve abdicated their responsibility to Nova Scotians on the issue of coastal protection,” said Liberal critic Braedon Clark. “They’ve downloaded this responsibility to municipalities and they’ve given them very little resources to come up with their own bylaws and enforce them.”

Lisa Lachance, the NDPs environment critic, said the Tory government’s decision was “deeply disturbing.” She said she has received “hundreds of emails” asking for the legislature to proclaim the law, or set it into force, “and the government has clearly walked away from that today.”

Story continues below advertisement

The government’s new plan contains 15 actions, including one that offers homeowners and municipalities access to an online hazard map that shows the worst-case scenario for sea level rise along the coast in the year 2100. Officials said more data would be added to the map over the coming months, including projections for coastal erosion and sea levels for 2050.

Halman said the three-year plan, which cost more than $3 million, also includes the creation of a four-person navigator service to help property owners understand the hazard map. As well, municipalities will be given draft examples of content they can use to enact coastal land-use bylaws, he said. There will also be a re-evaluation of the existing $200,000 cap on disaster relief funding in order to discourage development on coastal land at risk of flooding and erosion.

About $1.6 million of the funding will go toward an ongoing project to produce municipal flood mapping across the province. Officials said about one-third of the province has been mapped so far, with the project’s completion date expected as early as 2027.

Story continues below advertisement

“The reality is the legislation passed in 2019 only focused on new builds, it did not consider existing homes,” Halman said. “This plan is meant to help all coastal property owners, not just people who are building.”

In a statement, the Nova Scotia Federation of Municipalities (NFSM) said it is disappointed in the government’s shift to municipal land-use planning and is seeking clarification for its 49 members.

“NSFM will persist in seeking clarification on the allocation of resources to support municipalities, particularly those in rural areas or with limited planning capabilities,” the federation said.

The government plan was announced after three rounds of public consultation on the Coastal Protection Act. The minister said during the latest round that 40,000 questionnaires were distributed to owners of coastal property, adding that the response was “not that great” with just 1,070 replies.

Halman would not say how many people wanted the act proclaimed, saying only that “there is a diversity of opinion out there.”

Story continues below advertisement

Meanwhile, the Halifax-based Ecology Action Centre panned the government’s plan as a “failure of leadership.”

“Instead of saying this is where it’s safe and this is where it’s not safe they are just saying read up on the risks and here’s a map,” said Marla MacLeod, the centre’s director of programs. MacLeod said she was aware that more than 1,000 people had written letters calling for proclamation of the act and for provincial regulations.

“We are in a climate emergency and in an emergency we need people to take responsibility and leadership and the province is failing miserably,” she said.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 26, 2024.

Advertisement
Advertisement

You are viewing an Accelerated Mobile Webpage.

View Original Article