Advertisement

Controversial proposal to fast-track social housing towers heads to Vancouver council

Click to play video: 'Vancouver council considering controversial motion to build more social housing' Vancouver council considering controversial motion to build more social housing
WATCH: OneCity Councillor Christine Boyle is suggesting the city of Vancouver allow social housing projects up to 12 storeys without public hearings but as Jordan Armstrong reports, critics fear it could lead to demovictions and land speculation. – May 19, 2021

More than 100 people have signed up to speak to a controversial proposal that could see multi-storey social housing projects fast-tracked in some Vancouver neighbourhoods.

Coun. Christine Boyle has proposed a motion that would allow the approval of non-profit or co-op housing projects of up to 12 storeys without a lengthy public hearing process.

It comes a month after council approved a plan allowing the same sped-up process for non-profit projects up to six storeys.

Read more: Massive Vancouver detox, social housing project moves ahead after marathon public hearing

“I’m proposing that we make it easier to build a height that makes sense for each project, up to 12 storeys,” Boyle told Global News.

“What we’re likely to see is not a massive increase in the number of buildings, but it will make a difference where there are existing or co-op housing, older buildings that need to be redeveloped anyway, that those projects would have the flexibility to build to a height that makes the most sense for them.”

Story continues below advertisement

The proposal would apply to areas that are zoned RM-3A, RM-4, and RM-4N — lower-density multi-family housing — and mostly in the Kitsilano, Marpole, Grandview-Woodland, Mount Pleasant and Fairview.

Click to play video: 'Rally to take back Little Mountain' Rally to take back Little Mountain
Rally to take back Little Mountain – Dec 3, 2019

Boyle argues that many non-profit housing buildings in those areas are nearing the end of their lifespan, and that allowing the taller buildings will give their operators greater certainty and the ability to fund more social housing.

But the proposal has drawn criticism for a number of reasons, not least of which is the city’s own definition of “social housing.”

In order to qualify for that definition, 30 per cent of the units in a development must be held at subsidized rates for low income people.

That’s a concern for Coalition of Vancouver Neighbourhoods co-chair Larry Benge, who said the market rentals that make up the rest of the project — along with the height of the buildings themselves — will drive neighbourhood rents up.

Story continues below advertisement

Read more: Dozens living in RV campers told to vacate Vancouver streets

“Those will be absolutely threatened, even though the proponents have stated no, there will be no effect on surrounding land values,” he said.

“You’ve got your head in the sand if you think it’s not going to have any influence on that.”

Benge is also upset that the project would excise public consultation from developments on a case-by-case basis.

“The idea of promoting 12-storey buildings without any citizen recourse or public engagement and comment and decision making, sharing in the neighbourhoods that are directly affected by these buildings,” he said.

Andy Yan, director of Simon Fraser University’s City Program, said parts of the proposal remain ambiguous and leave key questions unanswered.

Click to play video: 'City of Vancouver looks at poor doors and shared entrances in mixed-use buildings' City of Vancouver looks at poor doors and shared entrances in mixed-use buildings
City of Vancouver looks at poor doors and shared entrances in mixed-use buildings – Apr 7, 2019

“What is actually going into, or whom is being housed in that possible 12 storeys?” he asked.

Story continues below advertisement

“How do you drift into that very specific number?”

Yan said the proposal does not map out what kind of units would be built in the buildings, nor does it tackle Vancouver’s nebulous definition of social housing.

Read more: Work begins on 200 new units of social housing in Vancouver’s DTES

“There is this concern about a kind of spray-and-pray density in Vancouver. Will this density only result in studios and one bedrooms as opposed to the types of units that are going to support and allow for families to flourish in Vancouver?”

Boyle said she’s confident in the city’s existing requirements for family-sized units within developments, which she argued non-profits already tend to exceed in their projects.

And she stressed the changes would only apply to non-profit housing operators, which she believes will prevent land speculation.

“There’s no profit to be made from the building, so any units that are at market rent subsidize the deeper affordability of other units,” she said.

“They can’t be a private developer, it can’t be earning anyone any profit.”

While council was set to begin hearing speakers Wednesday evening, no final decision on the idea will be made soon.

Story continues below advertisement

If council approves the motion, the proposal would be sent back to city staff — then head back to council in the fall for a public hearing.

Sponsored content