Advertisement

Businessman Frank Giustra’s lawsuit against Twitter can proceed in B.C. court: judge

Frank Giustra, a Canadian businessman, speaks as former President Bill Clinton looks on during a news conference to announce the Clinton Foundation's launching of a new sustainable development initiative in Latin America Thursday, June 21, 2007 in New York. A British Columbia businessman and philanthropist is suing Twitter for publishing "false and defamatory" tweets that escalated during the 2016 United States election. THE CANADIAN PRESS/AP, Frank Franklin II

A British Columbia Supreme Court judge has ruled that businessman Frank Giustra‘s lawsuit against Twitter Inc. over alleged “false and defamatory” tweets can proceed in the province.

Giustra, the founder of Lionsgate Entertainment and CEO of the Fiore Group of Companies, filed a civil lawsuit in April 2019 alleging that Twitter published defamatory tweets about him and neglected or refused to remove many of the posts despite his repeated requests.

Giustra says in a statement of claim that he sits on the Clinton Foundation board and the tweets escalated during the 2016 U.S. election, accusing him of being involved in “Pizzagate,” a debunked child sex-trafficking conspiracy theory.

Breaking news from Canada and around the world sent to your email, as it happens.

Twitter filed an application in June 2019 asking the B.C. court to dismiss or stay Giustra’s lawsuit or decline its jurisdiction in favour of the courts in California, where the company is headquartered.

Story continues below advertisement
Click to play video: 'Scheer says ‘Pizzagate’ is a ‘ridiculous’ conspiracy theory'
Scheer says ‘Pizzagate’ is a ‘ridiculous’ conspiracy theory

Justice Elliott Myers says in a decision posted online Friday that the court does have jurisdiction because Giustra has close ties to B.C. and tweets were published in the province and refer to B.C.

None of the allegations has been proven in court and Twitter declined to comment on the ruling, which only concerns jurisdiction and does not assess the merits of the civil claim.

Giustra says in a statement he hopes the lawsuit helps raise awareness of the real harm to society if social media platforms are not held responsible for the content published on their sites.

“I believe that words do matter, and recent events have demonstrated that hate speech can incite violence with deadly consequences,” he says.

Advertisement

Sponsored content

AdChoices