Defence’s case in Oak Bay child murder trial like ‘plot from a low-budget movie’: Crown

Andrew Berry, centre, appears in B.C. Supreme Court in Vancouver on Tuesday, April 16, 2019. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Felicity Don

Closing arguments at the trial of a Vancouver Island man accused of killing his two daughters heard Crown prosecutors compare the case put forward by defence to “a plot from a low-budget movie.”

Andrew Berry has pleaded not guilty to two counts of second-degree murder in the deaths of six-year-old Chloe and four-year-old Aubrey Berry, whose bodies were found in his Oak Bay apartment on Christmas Day, 2017.

Berry himself was found in the bathtub suffering from several stab wounds, which Crown has suggested were self-inflicted.

WATCH: (Sept. 19) Defence questions crime scene in Andrew Berry trial closing arguments

Click to play video: 'Defence questions crime scene in Andrew Berry trial closing arguments'
Defence questions crime scene in Andrew Berry trial closing arguments

The court has heard Berry suffered from depression and had attempted suicide a month before the killings because of a crippling gambling addiction, which made him unable to pay his bills and fear he’d lose custody of his daughters.

Story continues below advertisement

Both Berry and his defence have maintained the father was attacked by a person connected to a loan shark named “Paul” to whom he owed a significant gambling debt, and woke up later to discover his daughters had been killed.

On Friday, prosecutor Patrick Weir said the details provided by defence and during Berry’s testimony last month don’t add up, warning the jury not to believe in “conspiracy theories.”

Weir told the court Berry is a man who “simply cannot accept responsibility for his actions,” instead blaming a “non-existent” attacker who Berry has only given vague details about.

WATCH: (Sept. 18) Defence closing arguments continue in Andrew Berry murder trial

Click to play video: 'Defence closing arguments continue in Andrew Berry murder trial'
Defence closing arguments continue in Andrew Berry murder trial

Instead, Weir urged the jury to focus on the evidence while not allowing speculation brought forward by the defence to distract them from the truth.

Story continues below advertisement

“You don’t need to know why Andrew Berry did this,” he said.

Defence spent three days this week presenting its own closing arguments, pointing to inconsistencies in the evidence and questioning the testimony of the police officers who first responded to the scene.

In particular, the defence said the blood spatter does not support Crown’s theory that Berry stabbed his daughters in their beds, suggesting the real killer placed them there after killing them.

Earlier, lawyer Kevin McCullough had disputed other evidence brought forward by the blood spatter expert, who he called “inexperienced.”

But Weir said potential holes in the evidence should not form reasonable doubt.

WATCH: (Sept. 17) Closing arguments begin in Andrew Berry trial

Click to play video: 'Closing arguments begin in Andrew Berry trial'
Closing arguments begin in Andrew Berry trial

He went on to point the jury towards Berry’s stab wounds, which Weir said were “obviously” self-inflicted and were not defensive, differing from Aubrey and Chloe’s.

Story continues below advertisement

“What is absolutely clear is that Andrew Berry harmed himself,” Weir said, after stabbing the girls “again and again.”

Defence has repeatedly suggested police allowed the real killer to get away by not securing the crime scene for five minutes, and believed almost immediately Berry was the prime suspect. Weir pushed back on that theory too.

“There was no police conspiracy, there was no nonsensical master plan,” he said. “This trial is about one person and that person is Andrew Berry.”

With closing arguments wrapping up Friday, it’s expected the jury will be charged to start deliberating on Tuesday.

Sponsored content