May 27, 2019 8:30 pm
Updated: May 28, 2019 1:11 pm

City of Calgary assessing public golf courses for possible tax dollar savings

WATCH: The City of Calgary is studying how much its golf courses are worth and getting land assessments for potential redevelopment in hopes of saving tax dollars. But as Lisa MacGregor reports, one councillor wants the city to get out of the golf business.

A A

For the first time, the City of Calgary is looking at public golf courses with new eyes with the aim of reducing debt. Officials are working to find out how much their public golf courses are worth and how much it’s costing to maintain them.

The city is reviewing of all its public courses to weigh how much each one costs to maintain while also exploring any opportunities to sell, redevelop or decommission the land.

Land assessments are also being done to determine if redeveloping the land could save tax dollars.

Story continues below

“Bring in that real estate lens, looking at the encumbrances, what are some planning potentials, market value,” said Greg Steinraths, the City of Calgary’s golf and sport development manager.

“It could be a repositioning of the golf courses, sale of land that we’re not using, anything so we’re going to look at it through a bunch of different filters.”

In November 2018, at the One Calgary budget discussions, council directed administration to prepare a plan for a real estate and development assessment for the remaining golf amenities to sustain the overall operations of public golf courses in Calgary. On Monday, administration presented its plan.

There are a total of 99 holes between six public golf courses in Calgary. In 2017, Maple Ridge, Confederation, Lakeview, Richmond Green, McCall Lake all suffered loses, but Shaganappi Point profited and consistently has for the last few years, according to the report.

However, McCall Lake Golf Course isn’t a location the city is focused on redeveloping at this time, since $6.7 million in renovations were recently completed.

READ MORE: Newly redesigned McCall Lake golf course partially re-opens May 17

Taxpayers had to cover six per cent of the net losses in 2017. That’s down two per cent from 2016, when weather was poor and Lakeview was closed for the season. But the cost to taxpayers rose by two per cent from 2015, when there was a strong season with early course openings.

Ideally, the city says they want the taxpayer support for public courses to be at zero.

“One of the things that we’re looking at is instead of 18-hole play, come and play six holes, come and play three holes,” Steinraths said.

Coun. Joe Magliocca wants the city to get out of the golf business altogether. He thinks city-owned courses should stay public but be operated by private companies.

“A private sector’s got one superintendent for like seven or eight golf courses,” he said. “We have like two or three superintendents for each golf course so there’s a huge pay scale going around here.

“We’ve been bleeding millions of millions of dollars on our golf courses… we’re usually in the hole,” Magliocca said.

The city said on Tuesday: “The private sector typically has one superintendent for each golf course location. Superintendents typically have one or two assistant superintendents. The city has one superintendent with one assistant at five course locations. One of these superintendents has two separate courses to manage (Lakeview and Richmond).”

READ MORE: Fore! Calgary golf courses open this weekend for 2019 season

Mayor Naheed Nenshi said whatever decision is made on the future of public courses in Calgary, it will be “done responsibly.”

“To make sure that the investment in the community leaves the community even better,” Nenshi said.

The closure of a city-owned course is a possibility, especially for courses that never break even, according to council.

The report on maintenance costs for city courses is expected in July or September, while the land assessment should be complete by early next year, according to Coun. Ward Sutherland.

© 2019 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Report an error

Comments

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.