Advertisement

Canadian Civil Liberties Association threatens lawsuit over Sidewalk Labs project

Click to play video: 'Designers give sneak peek into what Sidewalk Labs will look like'
Designers give sneak peek into what Sidewalk Labs will look like
Designers of Sidewalk Labs and its Port Lands smart city project are providing a sneak peek into what the finished product will look like. Mark Carcasole has more – Mar 1, 2019

TORONTO – The Canadian Civil Liberties Association is threatening litigation related to Sidewalk Labs and Waterfront Toronto’s plans for a high-tech neighbourhood.

In a letter sent to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Ontario Premier Doug Ford and Toronto Mayor John Tory on Tuesday, the civil society dedicated to defending Canadian rights and freedoms said the Quayside project should be “reset” before Waterfront Toronto moves forward with any partner, including Alphabet Inc.-backed Sidewalk Labs.

The CCLA argued in the letter that the project poses constitutional problems because it has outsourced the public interest to a private company without democratic or legal authorities and it worries the project has opened the door to a “non-consensual, state-authorized mass capture of Canadians’ personal information.”

Story continues below advertisement

“Hit CTRL-ALT-DELETE on Sidewalk Toronto: before bidding and procurement, you must first legislate protections for the people from the risks of surveillance capitalism on our streets,” the letter said.

“The CCLA is contemplating litigation in this matter because your respective governments behave as if unaware that, constitutionally, the emperor has no clothes.”

If the process is not reset through government or by elected assembly, the letter said the association may need to resort to the courts.

The Quayside project, which still needs further approvals from all three levels of government, involves bringing affordable housing, heated sidewalks, raincoats for buildings and autonomous vehicle infrastructure to 12 acres of the city’s waterfront.

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Get daily National news

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

It has been marred in controversies over data and privacy concerns due to the vast amounts of information it could collect through phones, sensors and other devices used in the neighbourhood.

In an interview with The Canadian Press, CCLA executive director and general counsel Michael Bryant said his organization has been monitoring the project since its infancy, but decided to take action now because “we feel like the risk is too high and the action is too low amongst the legislators.”

Story continues below advertisement

“I doubt that any of the three governments are happy with the way things are going right now and what we are trying to do is say here is a constitutional path,” he said.

“The project was unfolding in a way that was entirely in the hands of the unelected and involving rights that impact all of us.”

The organization has yet to hear from any of the offices the letter was sent to, but will be following up, Bryant said.

The CCLA is not the first to raise issues with the project.

In late February, about 30 concerned citizens, including longtime Quayside critics Bianca Wylie and Saadia Muzaffar, formed an organization called Block Sidewalk, calling for the end of the project.

Story continues below advertisement

After Sidewalk Labs revealed in February that it was hoping to collect a cut of the city’s property taxes and development fees in exchange for funding a light rail transit line, some city councillors have also expressed reservations about the project.

An Ontario government source, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, told The Canadian Press the government was unaware Sidewalk Labs had such hopes and said the government “continues to have concerns surrounding both privacy and data that comes with this proposal.”

The source confided that “As it is written, there is no way our government would sign off on that plan,” but said it was likely too soon for the province to begin looking for proposals from others for the coveted waterfront property.

Sponsored content

AdChoices