Advertisement

U.S. Supreme Court denies Trump’s ban on asylum for illegal migrants

U.S. top court rejects Trump asylum restrictions
WATCH: U.S. top court rejects Trump asylum restrictions

The Supreme Court won’t let the Trump administration begin enforcing a ban on asylum for any immigrants who illegally cross the U.S.-Mexico border.

READ MORE: Trump’s attempt to ban asylum for illegal immigrants blocked by U.S. appeals court

Chief Justice John Roberts joined his four more liberal colleagues Friday in ruling against the administration in the very case in which President Donald Trump had derided the “Obama judge” who first blocked the asylum policy.

New Justice Brett Kavanaugh and three other conservative justices sided with the administration.

There were no opinions explaining either side’s votes.

WATCH: U.S. announces migrants seeking asylum will have to wait in Mexico until claim is processed

U.S. announces migrants seeking asylum will have to wait in Mexico until claim is processed
U.S. announces migrants seeking asylum will have to wait in Mexico until claim is processed

The court’s order leaves in place lower court rulings that blocked Trump’s proclamation in November automatically denying asylum to people who enter the country from Mexico without going through official border crossings.

Story continues below advertisement

Trump said he was acting in response to caravans of migrants making their way to the border.

The administration had also complained that the nationwide order preventing the policy from taking effect was too broad. But the court also rejected the administration’s suggestion for narrowing it.

READ MORE: Why are asylum seekers crossing into Canada on foot and what are their rights?

The high court action followed a ruling Wednesday by U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar that kept the ban on hold pending the outcome of a lawsuit challenging it. The case could take months to resolve.

The ban conflicts with an immigration law that says immigrants can apply for asylum regardless of how they enter the U.S., Tigar said.

In the first court ruling on the issue, Tigar said on Nov. 19 that U.S. law allows immigrants to request asylum regardless of whether they entered the country legally.

WATCH: Migrant family known for viral photo of them fleeing from tear gas seek asylum

Migrant family known for viral photo of them fleeing from tear gas seek asylum
Migrant family known for viral photo of them fleeing from tear gas seek asylum

The ruling prompted Trump’s criticism of Tigar as an “Obama judge” and led to an unusual public dispute between Trump and Roberts, who rebuked the president with a statement defending the judiciary’s independence.

Tigar was nominated for the federal bench by President Barack Obama.

Story continues below advertisement

That meant Democrats could continue to crow that they’d given Trump no wall money, while Trump claimed he was already well into construction using money that Congress approved for border security. “At this moment there is a debate over funding border security and the wall, also called – so that I give them a little bit of an out – ‘steel slats,”‘ Trump said Thursday. “We don’t use the word ‘wall’ necessarily, but it has to be something special to do the job.”