Environmentalists ask Minnesota regulators to reconsider Enbridge’s proposed Line 3 pipeline replacement project

Environmental and Indigenous groups asked Minnesota regulators on Tuesday to reconsider their approval of Enbridge’s plans to replace its aging Line 3 crude oil pipeline across northern Minnesota.

The groups, including the Sierra Club, Youth Climate Intervenors, Friends of the Headwaters and Honor the Earth, filed their requests with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission. Opponents contend the line does not meet permit criteria.

In June, the commission gave Enbridge the green light to replace Line 3. But a PUC meeting to discuss whether Enbridge met conditions was postponed earlier this month after being disrupted by protesters.

READ MORE: Protests prompt Minnesota regulators to postpone Line 3 meeting

Opponents argue the PUC erred in granting a certificate of need for Line 3 because alleged harm to society would outweigh the replacement line’s benefits, and that Enbridge did not prove the pipeline was needed.

“Line 3 would threaten our clean water, our communities, and our climate,” Margaret Levin, state director for the Sierra Club North Star Chapter, said in a statement.

Tweet This Click to share quote on Twitter: "Line 3 would threaten our clean water, our communities, and our climate," Margaret Levin, state director for the Sierra Club North Star Chapter, said in a statement.

Get weekly money news

Get expert insights, Q&A on markets, housing, inflation, and personal finance information delivered to you every Saturday.

Sign up for weekly money newsletter Sign Up

By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Winona LaDuke, executive director of Honor the Earth, said the PUC made a “rogue decision” to approve Line 3 against the recommendations of other agencies. LaDuke called it “a crisis of civil society” and said “we need the PUC to reconsider what this decision means for the future of Minnesota and the planet.”

Indigenous groups and environmental activists contend the new line is unnecessary and risks spills in fragile areas. Calgary-based Enbridge said the old line is increasingly subject to corrosion and cracking, and that its maintenance needs are accelerating.

READ MORE: Enbridge reaches deal on Line 3 pipeline project with Indigenous group in Minnesota

Enbridge said that without a new Line 3, its customers would have to rely more heavily on rail and truck transport, which have higher costs and risks.

“In June, the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission voted unanimously to approve the certificate of need for Enbridge’s Line 3 replacement project. The petitions filed today are an expected part of this very thorough regulatory process,” Enbridge said in a statement Tuesday night. “The Line 3 replacement project is a safety and maintenance-driven project that is intended to protect the communities and the environment in northern Minnesota.”

READ MORE: What you need to know about Enbridge’s Line 3 pipeline proposal

Watch below: In August 2017, Kent Morrison filed this report about the Line 3 replacement project and the optimism it is generating in Alberta.

2:20 Optimism growing in Alberta town over Enbridge’s Line 3 project

Line 3 runs from Alberta across North Dakota and Minnesota to Enbridge’s terminal in Superior, Wis.

Enbridge wants to replace the line, which it built in the 1960s, and is running at only about half its original capacity. The replacement would restore its original capacity.