Advertisement

Lac-Mégantic residents, businesses seek to sue CP Rail over rail disaster

Smoke rises from railway cars that were carrying crude oil after derailing in downtown Lac-Mégantic, Que., Saturday, July 6, 2013. Paul Chiasson / The Canadian Press

A new group of mostly  Lac-Mégantic residents is seeking authorization from Quebec Superior Court to sue for economic and moral damages worth upwards of $5 million relating to the Lac-Mégantic rail tragedy in 2013.

Train engineer Tom Harding, Canadian Pacific Railway and Montreal, Maine & Atlantic, the defunct railway company at the heart of the disaster, are named in the court document filed in mid-May.

READ MORE: 3 men found not guilty of criminal negligence in train derailment that killed 47 people

The motion to institute proceedings was filed in Lac-Megantic and involves 49 plaintiffs who opted to not join another, massive class-action with 5,000 people and businesses that was authorized in 2015 against the same defendants.

Earlier this year, the judge hearing that case joined it with a $409-million Quebec government lawsuit and another lawsuit brought by insurance companies. That one trial is to be heard in September 2019.

Story continues below advertisement

READ MORE: Lac-Mégantic residents upset over losing land to new railway track project

On July 6, 2013, a runaway train hauling tanker cars loaded with volatile crude oil broke loose and barrelled into the town of 6,000 in the wee hours before derailing and exploding.

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Get daily National news

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

It set off several massive blasts that wiped out a large swath of the downtown core and killed 47 people.

Three former MMA employees charged criminally in connection with disaster were found not guilty by a jury last January: Harding, rail traffic controller Richard Labrie and manager of train operations Jean Demaître.

One month later, the Crown announced it would not appeal the verdicts.

‘Another legal problem’

The new filing, like the other legal challenges against the railway, alleges that Canadian Pacific was negligent in the leadup to the accident and should have known the product being shipped was volatile. It also states the company had responsibility for the cargo being shipped.

A Canadian Pacific spokesman said there would be no comment as the matter is under litigation, but the railway giant has previously denied any responsibility in the disaster because it handed off the trains to MMA for the final leg of the journey.

Story continues below advertisement

READ MORE: 5 years after Lac-Megantic tragedy claimed 47 lives, $133M rail bypass to be built

The new motion describes the plaintiffs as people who resided in the Lac-Mégantic area, owned or leased property there or were physically in the area at the time of the disaster and suffered losses.

A total of $5.1 million is being claimed, with amounts varying from $15,000 to $1 million.

The motion says the amounts are being sought for various reasons, including stress, being forced from home and the loss of income, personal property or enjoyment of life.

In this July 6, 2013, file photo, smoke rises from railway cars that were carrying crude oil after derailing in downtown Lac Megantic, Que. Quebec's environmental review agency says the majority of Lac-Megantic residents appear to favour keeping the railway track in the town, Tuesday, August 1, 2017.
In this July 6, 2013, file photo, smoke rises from railway cars that were carrying crude oil after derailing in downtown Lac-Mégantic. Paul Chiasson / The Canadian Press

A Quebec City law firm representing the 49 plaintiffs declined to comment further Thursday.

Charles Shearson, Harding’s lawyer, said his client’s name remains on the list of defendants despite his limited means.

Story continues below advertisement

“I think his ultimate goal is to get all the legal processes out of the way so he can embark in some kind of healing, some kind of semblance of regaining a normal life for himself, given the circumstances.”

Sponsored content

AdChoices