Advertisement

Sally Yates to testify about warning White House on Michael Flynn

Click to play video: 'Sean Spicer admits Trump transition team didn’t vet Michael Flynn'
Sean Spicer admits Trump transition team didn’t vet Michael Flynn
WATCH ABOVE: Sean Spicer admits Trump transition team didn't vet Michael Flynn – Apr 27, 2017

Former acting attorney general Sally Yates is expected to testify to Congress next week that she expressed alarm to the White House about President Donald Trump‘s national security adviser’s contacts with the Russian ambassador, which could contradict how the administration has characterized her counsel.

Yates on Monday is expected to recount her Jan. 26 conversation about Michael Flynn and to say that she was concerned by discrepancies between the administration’s public statements on his contacts with ambassador Sergey Kislyak and what really transpired, according to a person familiar with that discussion and knowledgeable about Yates’s plans for her testimony.

The person spoke on condition of anonymity so as not to pre-empt the testimony.

READ MORE: Donald Trump’s former adviser Michael Flynn was warned in 2014 not to take foreign payments

Yates is expected to say that she told White House counsel Don McGahn that she believed Flynn’s communications with Kislyak could leave Flynn in a compromised position because of the contradictions between the public depictions of the calls and what intelligence officials knew to be true, the person said.

Story continues below advertisement

White House officials have said publicly that Yates merely wanted to give them a “heads-up” about Flynn’s Russian contacts, but Yates is likely to testify that she approached the White House with alarm, according to the person.

Breaking news from Canada and around the world sent to your email, as it happens.

WATCH: Michael Flynn seek immunity if he testifies before Russia probe

“So just to be clear, the acting attorney general informed the White House counsel that they wanted to give a ‘heads up’ to us on some comments that may have seemed in conflict with what he had sent the Vice President out in particular,” White House press secretary Sean Spicer told reporters at a Feb. 14 press briefing.

Flynn resigned in February after published reports detailed Yates’s conversation with the White House. White House officials initially maintained that Flynn had not discussed Russian sanctions with Kislyak during the transition period, but after news reports said the opposite, they then admitted that he had misled them about the nature of that call.

Story continues below advertisement

READ MORE: Former Donald Trump adviser Michael Flynn likely broke law with Russia trip, House committee says

“The issue, pure and simple, came down to a matter of trust,” Spicer told reporters.

Flynn was in frequent contact with Kislyak on the day the Obama administration slapped sanctions on Russia for election-related hacking, as well as at other times during the transition period, a U.S. official has said.

Yates’s scheduled appearance before a Senate Judiciary subcommittee, alongside former national intelligence director James Clapper, will provide her first public account of the conversation with the White House. It will also represent her first testimony before Congress since Yates, an Obama administration holdover, was fired in January for refusing to defend Trump’s travel ban.

She was previously scheduled to appear in March before a House committee investigating Russian interference in the presidential election, but that hearing was canceled.

Sponsored content

AdChoices