Advertisement

Opposition calls for Quebec’s new transport minister to take stand on Uber

Click to play video: 'Quebec’s position on Uber'
Quebec’s position on Uber
WATCH ABOVE: Opposition parties want Quebec's transport minister to clarify his position on Uber after concert-goers were reportedly left stranded during a Celine Dion show in Quebec City. Global's Raquel Fletcher reports – Aug 23, 2016

When the first taxis left Quebec City’s Videotron Centre Saturday night with their fares, other Celine Dion concert-goers waited in the rain for up to an hour.

“We had an agreement with the industry here in the City of Quebec,” Quebec City Mayor Régis Labeaume said.

“There’s been a breach Saturday night.”

READ MORE: Uber, Quebec government strike deal, hope to end taxi protests

According to the mayor, about 450 taxis were needed at the end of the concert, but as few as 93 were on the road by the end of the night.

Labeaume questioned whether the city may be better served by more options, like Uber.

Story continues below advertisement

The provincial government has said it will start regulating Uber under new taxi legislation starting next month.

READ MORE: Montreal taxi drivers protest ‘lack of progress’ on regulating Uber

New Transport Minister Laurent Lessard said he hopes to come up with a solution where Uber will respect the laws of Quebec.

“So that there’s no loopholes,” he explained.

The minister said he’s meeting with Uber next week.

Nevertheless, the opposition is accusing the government of dragging its feet.

READ MORE: Quebec Transport Minister won’t back down on essential items in Uber legislation

“After almost 70 days, we don’t have any clue – any answer – about the fact that the government has negotiated with Uber,” said CAQ house leader François Bonnardel.

A taxi industry spokesperson, Guy Chevrette, said the night of Dion’s concert was particularly busy with multiple events and they will ensure to have enough cabs in the future.

He also added that if Quebec reaches a deal with Uber, there’s one condition: “Equality before the law, you know? It’s indispensable.”

Sponsored content

AdChoices