Alberta’s secession movement is unlike other separatist efforts in democratic countries across the world, experts say.
Those outside of Canada, including ones that led to the 2014 referendum on Scottish independence and the 2017 vote on whether the distinct people of Catalonia should leave Spain, all have similar characteristics.
“Significant secession movements starts with nationhood, the idea that members of this movement don’t consider themselves to be members of the nation that is embodied by the state,” said Andre Lecours, a University of Ottawa political science professor.
“Typically, you have an objective cultural marker behind it, religion, language, belief in a different genealogy or a previous independent existence, like Scotland.”
He said these characteristics are nonexistent in Alberta’s separatists, who Premier Danielle Smith has said have a decade-long list of resentments with the federal government over grievances over energy and environmental policies.
Whether these beefs are worth quitting Canada for will be tested in an Oct. 19 referendum, when Albertans will be asked whether they want to remain in Canada or start the process to hold a binding referendum on separation.
“It’s time to have a vote, understand the will of Albertans on this subject, and move on,” Smith announced in an televised address last week.
Lecours said the referendum in Alberta is puzzling.
“There are no significant secessionist movements that hinge only on fiscal and economic grievances,” he said.
“Alberta separatism is an outlier.”
Duane Bratt, a political science professor at Mount Royal University, said Alberta separatists have existed since the province joined Confederation in 1905. But they’ve never been this close to a referendum.
They have generally identified themselves as hard-working people who want little government interference, Bratt said. Their grievances have largely focused on Alberta’s natural resources and western alienation.
Get daily National news
Some issues have evolved since, but key economic grievances have remained, he said.
“It’s a moving target.”
The last time Alberta’s separatism movement saw a significant boom was in the 1980s, Bratt said.
Separatists were fed up with former prime minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau’s Liberal government and his National Energy Program, which among other things increased taxes on Alberta’s oil revenue. The program was eventually dismantled.
Throughout Alberta’s history, Bratt said, every time the separatist movement gained momentum, the province’s premiers pushed back against them and the federal government.
The difference today is the premier, Bratt said. “Smith has enabled (separatists).”
Lecours agrees.
“(Smith) negotiates with them, changes legislation,” he said, referring to legislative changes in the last year that make it easier for separatists to put together citizen-led petitions to trigger a referendum.
He said it’s also rare for a leader who didn’t run on a separation platform to charge toward a referendum on one.
Significant referendums recently held elsewhere have been led by political parties dedicated to independence, Lecours said.
In Scotland, for example, the Scottish National Party leads the movement.
“When they were in a position to hold a referendum on independence, they did. They required a consent (from) United Kingdom to do that. In 2014, they had one, which produced 45 per cent in favour of independence.”
- Father holds onto memories, hopes for justice after daughter murdered in Winnipeg
- Toronto’s bike share program preparing for starring role in World Cup logistics
- Montreal vigil honours 3-year-old killed in LaSalle bouncy castle accident
- Vitali Stefanski denies harming ex-wife Tatjana during murder trial testimony
Economic grievances have increased separatist sentiments in history, he said, but they were also under extreme circumstances.
Western Australia was a distinct British colony before it joined Australia more than a 100 years ago.
“The history of Western Australia within Australia was only like 32 years before they held a referendum in 1933,” Lecours said.
Lecours said that while it’s unclear how strong Western Australia’s nationhood was, there are indications that the Great Depression exacerbated separatist grievances.
The referendum asked whether Western Australia wanted to return to being a self-governing colony of the British Empire.
About 66 per cent voted in favour of independence, Lecours said. However, the process was too complicated and separatists agreed to enter an agreement with the Australian government that saw them receive grants.
“They created the Commonwealth Grants Commission, which is a fiscal body that administers what we would call today the equalization program,” he said.
“The literature says that was really important. Then there was the outbreak of (Second World War), and there were bigger fish to fry.”
Andrew McDougall, a lawyer and professor in the University of Toronto’s political science department, said the U.S. Civil War over slavery in the 1860s was another significant secession movement.
“But they had a war that settled that point.”
McDougall said in Canada the most known secession movement has been in Quebec over a strong sense of nationhood among French Canadians.
“The Quebec nationalist movement began to question the place of Quebec in Canada, whether or not Canada was fair to the French Canadians,” he said.
“In Alberta, regional grievances are playing out rather than an underlying nationalism you see in Quebec or another place.”
Lecours said Alberta’s population, much like the rest of Canada, was largely formed by Indigenous Peoples and American and European settlers.
He said surveys have shown a majority of Albertans identify as Canadian first.
“It’s unseen, unheard of, that people who don’t identify with a nation different from the country they live in would want independence,” Lecours said.
“Alberta is just fascinating.”
The point isn’t JUST that Alberta continuously pays into the transfer payments where other provinces with resources take the cash happily and cast distain on Alberta.
It isn’t JUST that conservatives lost the last election, or that the party in charge has shifted their economic, environmental, and social policies further out of alignment with the prevailing beliefs of the majority of that population.
– The combination of increased taxation without representation,
– the distain the province receives for extracting carbon fuels,
– the hypocrisy of recipients of the transfer payments importing the same carbon fuels from outside Canada, that Alberta is disparaged for producing, with the cash Alberta has transferred, and with a blind eye to how they are provided or the humanitarian or environmental cost of transporting them.
When you start to combine the weight of these factors and more, even Albertans who do not want to separate understand why some do.
With Carney and liberals and their all out effort to destroy Canada I am surprised more provinces aren’t bailing off of the sinking titancanada.
Even Al Jazeera has reported on it, more than once, it isn’t an outlier in the secession movements of the world. It is leading the way.
Smith I keep saying go back to your mother country b. You and your idiots. Please do Canada a big favour.
To Fakiha Baig regarding the Alberta seccessionist movement. It’s not just the Premier that’s making the difference on Alberta secession. This problem has compounded like interest over the years from what happened in the 1980’s and even before that. As for the Trudeaus, like father like son.
And the thing is, almost everything Justin did did not help Alberta in the worst of times since the great depression.
Is it any wonder then that a separatist movement has started? This is a case of neglect and serious mismanagement. To quote Isaac Newton, “For every action there is an opposite and equal reaction”.
I don’t believe Alberta will separate at all. But they will be heard and maybe get a little bit more freedom to run their own affairs.
Time for Texas to show Alberta what separating is. Texas when will you separate from the US?
“He said surveys have shown a majority of Albertans identify as Canadian first.”
Maybe they should try polling conservative ridings. We live in one, and our phone hasn’t rang with pollster calls in almost 10 years.
Traitors should face the noose
Hey Willy Marlin: It’s not about the party that didn’t win, although the deck is stacked against the west when it comes to federal elections, rather Twattawa meddling in Alberta’s affairs!!!
It would appear the majority of the commenters here missed the point of the article. Being pissy that your party didn’t win the federal election doesn’t give you the right to try and “separate” your province from the country. Perhaps the CPC should try running a platform and leader that the majority of voters might be willing to vote for.
Alberta “separatism” is the adult equivalent to, “I didn’t get my way so I’m taking my toys and going home”. Childish nonsense.
in december 2024 conservatives under pierre poilievre, were poised to win a super majority in the house of commons., largely because of the unpopularity of justin trudau, but people were also scared of a conservative govt under poilievre, so after trudeau left and carney arrive, the liberals’ fortunes flipped and the liberals won a fourth term in office. this deeply angered voters in mostly rural alberta, just as it did in 1980 after trudeau the elder retook the majority in the house of commons.
what better way to express that anger than bu threatening separation? and that is where we are now, especially aided anfd abetted by a libertarian premier like danielle smith.
ask a pro separatist about his /her vision for an independent alberta nation they have liitle of intelligence to say other than to say they want the liberals out of ottawa and thus out of their lives.
Imagine that, an Ottawa university professer telling Albertans how they should feel. Isn’t that how we got here in the first place?
Why can’t Canada just accept Alberta independence like the British Empire accepted Canadian independence? Yes there were Britain’s upset that the Commonwealth was being dismantled but the British Parliament accepted that Canada wanted to go on its own.
Ottawa has to stop trying to control all aspects of the economy and go back to letting business conduct business.
Socialist/communist governments cannot bring prosperity, just a common and lower standard of living.
Another load of leftist Bull. Alberta seperation is rooted in the Trudeau family. Pierre got it started, with trying to control the oil industry. Then his whelp rev’ed it way up with trying to shut it down.
Currently, Carney is saying words that are proper and should lower seperation sentiment. Problem is, that Ottawa has a history of saying nothing words then just carrying on their plans.
The only way for Carney to lower the separation temperature is to actually do things to dismantle the threats put in by sock boy and is weasley friends.
Ditch all that anti oil development legislation and the seperist threat becomes less.
I think the professor is missing the larger issue that has created this event, which is, how can one area, and a minority, control other very separate areas as well as a majority of people with very different political beliefs?
What do the people of Toronto or Ottawa or Montreal have to do with the people in Fort Nelson, or Fort Smith, or really any northern town? The Lib government passed a law stating vehicles have to be zero emission by 2035 without considering the difficulty of this for the vast majority of rural Canadians, let alone poorer urban Canadians. There was no thought given to the practicalness of this political idea, just as the same thing is happening with the gun laws.
Politicians appeal to their base, and not the general public they are supposed to serve, and this creates resentment and disharmony.
The “experts” would be best to actually consider the point that the majority of Canadians did not vote for the current government, and almost never have.
Hmmm… the US left British rule for just those reasons. There are several like that.
Alberta was largely formed by European settlers 65%. There are less than 7% natives. We have more south asians than natives.