Advertisement

Alberta government defends transgender youth health law in court

Click to play video: 'Alberta government argues transgender youth health law in court'
Alberta government argues transgender youth health law in court
WATCH: An Alberta judge is now considering final arguments on the constitutionality of unprecedented transgender legislation that bans minors from gender-affirming treatment, such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy. Sarah Offin has more from an injunction hearing, where both sides argue they are protecting choice. – Mar 11, 2025

Alberta’s transgender law returned to court Tuesday, with government lawyers arguing the legislation is grounded in science and keeps children safe.

The law bars youth under 16 from receiving hormone therapy and puberty blockers. It’s being challenged by groups representing transgender youth, who are asking the courts to temporarily suspend the law pending a hearing on its constitutionality.

The groups argue the law violates the Charter because it denies medical care.

Government lawyer David Madsen told court that’s not the case, as hormone therapy is not considered medically necessary.

“This Charter challenge will fail,” Madsen told Justice Allison Kuntz. He argued that the province is protecting at-risk youth from making life-altering decisions at a vulnerable stage of their lives.

“The polarized atmosphere surrounding this topic is exactly why Alberta has elected to follow the science and all the more reason to show deference to the legislation,” he said.

Story continues below advertisement

Madsen also argued scientific consensus around gender-affirming care is “rapidly shifting” and described the government’s approach to be precautionary in light of that uncertainty.

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Get daily National news

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

The judge reserved her decision on the injunction to a later date.

Alberta became the first Canadian province to enact the legislation that prohibits LGBTQ2 youth from receiving gender-affirming medical care.

Premier Danielle Smith’s United Conservative Party government passed the law last year, but it has yet to be fully proclaimed and put it into legal effect. The province has not said when that might happen. A prohibition halting gender-affirming “top” surgeries for minors came into effect in December.

Two LGBTQ2 advocacy groups, Egale and Skipping Stone Foundation, are seeking a court injunction. They have called the government’s action unprecedented, saying it’s unconstitutional to deny medical care on the basis of being gender diverse.

Lawyers for the groups and five unnamed transgender children, ages six to 11, presented their arguments Monday.

Adam Goldenberg, a lawyer representing the applicants, disputed many of the government’s arguments, including its assertion that the injunction application is premature because the law hasn’t been proclaimed.

“It would defeat the purpose of the injunction, if (transgender youth) actually had to be suffering the irreparable harm that the injunction seeks to enjoin,” Goldenberg said.

Story continues below advertisement

The law is one of three affecting transgender people that were passed in Alberta. The second, which is not being challenged in court, requires children under 16 have parental consent if they wish to change their names or pronouns in school.

The third bans transgender athletes from competing in female amateur sports and requires schools and organizations to report eligibility complaints.

Smith has said she’s confident the new restrictions fall within the Charter and would withstand a legal challenge.

But if the challenge is successful, Smith has said she would use the Charter’s notwithstanding clause. The clause allows governments to override certain Charter rights for up to five years.

“I hope it wouldn’t come to that. But for sure, we would,” Smith said on her radio show in December.

Story continues below advertisement

 

Sponsored content

AdChoices