Advertisement

4 COVID-19 court cases dismissed by B.C. Supreme Court

Click to play video: 'Four COVID-19 court cases dismissed by B.C. Supreme Court'
Four COVID-19 court cases dismissed by B.C. Supreme Court
WATCH: There's been a swift dismissal of four court cases that challenged B.C.'s health orders during the pandemic. – Sep 14, 2022

A B.C. Supreme Court judge has dismissed four cases challenging of the province’s COVID-19 public health orders.

During the most challenging moments in B.C.’s COVID-19 pandemic journey, the overwhelming majority of British Columbians trusted advice from the provincial health officer and followed public health advice.

But, there were some who marched the streets in opposition – at times peaceful but also on many occasions combative.

Among the many claims made by those at demonstrations was that mandatory vaccination was a violation of a person’s human rights and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The latest health and medical news emailed to you every Sunday.
Receive the latest medical news and health information delivered to you every Sunday.

Get weekly health news

Receive the latest medical news and health information delivered to you every Sunday.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Now, many months later, those claims reached a judge, only to be dismissed.

Story continues below advertisement

“The courts are finding COVID-19 is real and very serious. There is a very clear instruction from the court that vaccines help the general public.” said Kyle Bievenu, a B.C. lawyer.

This week, a B.C. Supreme Court chief justice found four consecutive challenges, that were alleging COVID-19 health orders in B.C. violated human rights, to be unsubstantiated.

In his rulings Chief Justice Christopher Hinkson found Dr. Bonnie Henry used scientific evidence when putting in her orders.

“(Provincial Health Orders were) guided by the principles applicable to public health decision making,” Hinkson said.

“I decline to consider the petitioners’ arguments in respect of the alleged Charter violations. The present petition is premature.”

 

Advertisement

Sponsored content

AdChoices