Crown appeals stay of proceedings in case of Quebec judge accused of killing wife

Prosecutors filed an appeal on Thursday in an attempt to have a former Quebec judge stand trial again in connection with the murder of his wife.

Jacques Delisle walked out of the Quebec City courthouse a free man on April 8 after Quebec Superior Court Justice Jean-François Emond granted him a stay of proceedings. He spent nine years in prison before he was freed last year, after federal Justice Minister David Lametti ordered a new trial.

Emond agreed with Delisle’s lawyers, who argued that a retrial would be impossible because a Crown expert had made serious errors in a pathology report. They also said there had been unreasonable delays in the case.

The Crown, however, said in its filing that Emond’s decision to stay the case hampers the fundamental process of seeking truth, adding that the ruling “is likely to compromise public confidence in the administration of justice.”

READ MORE: 7 face charges for sex crimes involving children: Quebec City police

Get daily National news

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up

By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Prosecutors François Godin and Julien Beauchamp-Laliberte argued that Emond erred by finding fault on the part of the state and concluding — before a jury has seen the evidence — that a future trial would be unfair.

A former judge on the Quebec Court of Appeal, Delisle, now 86, was found guilty of first-degree murder in the death of his wife, Marie Nicole Rainville, and was sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole for 25 years. Delisle said Rainville had taken her own life, while the Crown had argued the ex-magistrate had shot her in the head.

Emond’s 99-page ruling cited the “gross negligence” of a pathologist who failed to photograph the brain or take samples that would’ve shown traces of the bullet that killed her.

“The unavailability of this evidence is so damaging that the applicant’s right to make full answer and defence is violated,” the judge wrote.

A major part of the case revolved around the angle of entry of the bullet, which could confirm or infer a suicide. Questions about the reliability of this evidence allowed for a new trial to be ordered.

But the Crown argues that despite the trajectory of the bullet, murder remains a possible verdict for a jury given the entirety of the evidence against the judge.

Delisle’s lawyer, Maxime Roy, said in an email Thursday he had no comment on the appeal filed by the prosecution.

1:57 Court hears audio clip of Johnny Depp throwing wedding ring in argument with Amber Heard

• Court hears audio clip of Johnny Depp throwing wedding ring in argument with Amber Heard
• Johnny Depp claims texts about burning Amber Heard’s body was a reference to ‘Monty Python’
• Court shown Amber Heard’s secret recording of Johnny Depp violently smashing cupboards and glasses
• Defamation trial: Depp testifies about photo of him sleeping with melted ice cream on his lap
• Defamation trial: Jury hears alleged audio recording of Heard, Depp discussing his drug, alcohol use
• Johnny Depp alleges Amber Heard threw liquor bottle at him, severing his finger
• ‘Too many lines were crossed’: Johnny Depp details alleged abuse by ex-wife Amber Heard
• Johnny Depp takes stand in defamation trial against Amber Heard: ‘My goal is the truth’
• Johnny Depp’s lawyer gives opening statement on Day 1 of defamation trial against Amber Heard
• Defamation lawyer explains Johnny Depp tabloid verdict

Previous Video

Next Video