Majority support Trudeau’s climate policy pitches made at COP26, poll suggests

Click to play video: 'Trudeau says world needs ‘standard’ carbon pricing'
Trudeau says world needs ‘standard’ carbon pricing
WATCH: Trudeau says world needs 'standard' carbon pricing – Nov 2, 2021

After Prime Minister Justin Trudeau made multiple policy announcements across the pond at the COP26 climate summit in Scotland, a new poll hints at how Canadians feel about those developments.

Sixty-nine per cent of respondents to an online survey by Leger and the Association for Canadian Studies say they support Canada’s announcement at the summit that it will cap and reduce pollution from the oil and gas sector toward net zero by 2050.

Some 65 per cent of respondents also say they support the government’s new policy to stop exporting coal by 2030, a move which would end the trade abroad of about 36 million tonnes of the resource, currently 60 per cent of what the country produces.

Story continues below advertisement

Sixty-one per cent also support Canada’s recent policy announcement that it will halt subsidies that assist oil and natural gas companies to run and grow their operations outside the country by the end of 2022.

Click to play video: 'Scientists warn planet will warm by 2.4°C despite COP26 commitments'
Scientists warn planet will warm by 2.4°C despite COP26 commitments

The online survey of 1,565 Canadians cannot be assigned a margin of error because internet-based polls are not considered random samples.

Despite general agreement on these issues, Leger executive vice-president Christian Bourque says Canadians from fossil fuel-producing regions including Saskatchewan and Alberta tend to agree less on policies related to climate change because those changes directly affect their economies.

Click to play video: 'COP26: Poorer nations demand more climate action from richer countries'
COP26: Poorer nations demand more climate action from richer countries

Meanwhile, respondents from Quebec led the other provinces in their support of Canada’s recent climate policy commitments, followed by British Columbia.

Story continues below advertisement

“In regions like B.C. or Quebec, we see that the level of agreement with reducing production and pollution is always higher because it doesn’t directly affect the economy,” said Bourque.

He added that one of the reasons why Quebec agrees more with these climate-related policies has to do with broad consensus in the province on reducing the use of fossil fuels.

“There’s no opposition to that. There’s no voice that’s speaking on behalf of the industry that’s clearly being heard,” Bourque said.

Canadians were split on how they rate the country’s effort to address climate change, with half agreeing that Canada has taken great strides and 40 per cent disagreeing.

The survey also asked Canadians to share how their perception of climate change more generally.

Three in four respondents said they believe there is still time to put measures in place to stop climate change, a rate that is about on par with a cohort of American respondents who answered the same question.

Asked about how they feel about climate change, younger respondents report higher rates of stress compared to older cohorts, with 38 per cent of those aged 18 to 34 saying they are “very stressed.”

Story continues below advertisement

“Now that there’s something called `eco-anxiety’ among young people, it sort of shows in the data,” said Bourque.

Click to play video: 'COP26: Key players missing from plans to stop international funding fossil fuel projects'
COP26: Key players missing from plans to stop international funding fossil fuel projects

Those surveyed were more mixed on former environmental activist Steven Guilbeault’s fitness as Canada’s environment minister, with almost half saying he’s a good choice and a third saying they don’t know.

Bourque said he was surprised there was not more resistance from respondents to Guilbeault’s nomination, because the poll question mentioned the minister’s past as a Greenpeace activist.

“The reason why we put that in is we thought if you’re an opponent (of Guilbeault), that’s the first thing you would raise,” said Bourque. “Even when we include that into the question, people are either waiting to pass judgment or don’t see really much of a problem with it.”

Sponsored content