Advertisement

Judge to make decision on joint submission in Travis Baumgartner trial

Travis Baumgartner, 22, appears in court in Edmonton. He pleaded guilty to one count of first-degree murder, two counts of second-degree murder, and one count of attempted murder on September 9, 2013. Court sketch by Amanda McRoberts

Correction: This is an updated version of the original story. The original version of the story said Justice John Rooke had accepted the joint submission by the Crown and Defence. It has been corrected to indicate Justice Rooke has yet to make his decision. 

EDMONTON – On Wednesday, Justice John Rooke is expected to make a decision whether to accept a joint submission by the Crown and the Defence for a global sentence of life in prison with no parole eligibility for 40 years for Travis Baumgartner.

Baumgartner has pleaded guilty for murdering three co-workers and attempting to murder a fourth at the University of Alberta’s Hub Mall. He’s been convicted of one count of first degree murder, two counts of second degree murder and one count of attempted murder.

Justice Rooke called the crime a “violation on the sanctity of life” and “cowardly.”

Story continues below advertisement

Justice Rooke also told the courtroom the sentence is “as much for the family and friends, and the public, as it is for the lawyers.”

“This is the harshest sentence in Canada since the last execution in 1962,” said Chief Crown Prosecutor Steven Bilodeau.

Twenty-two-year-old Baumgartner was originally charged with three counts of first-degree murder, one count of attempted murder and four counts of robbery with a firearm.

On the first day of the trial on Monday, Baumgartner pleaded guilty to first-degree murder in the death of Eddie Rejano, two counts of second-degree murder in the deaths of Brian Ilesic and Michelle Shegelski, and guilty of one count of attempted murder in the shooting of Matthew Schuman.

The four robbery with a firearm charges were stayed.

Court heard that Baumgartner had joked about robbing G4S and, on June 14, 2012, had a fight with his mother about rent money.

“Don’t worry, you’ll get your money,” said Baumgartner on June 14, according to the Agreed Statement of Facts.

According to an Agreed Statement of Facts, Baumgartner was on shift with four other G4S guards reloading an ATM at the University of Alberta’s HUB Mall in the early morning hours of June 15, 2012 when he shot his co-workers, three of them fatally.

Story continues below advertisement

Court heard 35-year-old Ilesic and 26-year-old Shegelski died immediately inside the ATM vestibule. Schuman was shot in the head and was left locked inside the vestibule, bleeding from a massive head wound, and yelling for help.

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

Get breaking National news

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Court heard that Baumgartner, who was 21-years-old at the time of the shooting, then left the scene, walked to where the G4S armoured vehicle was parked, reloaded his weapon, and fatally shot 39-year-old Eddie Rejano.

According to the Agreed Statement of Facts, Baumgartner had more than $600,000 of stolen cash in his possession at that time. He ended up dropping off money for his friends, and leaving money for his mother before changing clothes and driving away in a Ford pickup truck.

Baumgartner was arrested less than 48-hours after the shooting when he tried to cross the Canada-U.S. border near Abbotsford, B.C. He had $334,000 in a backpack when he was arrested.

While in custody, Baumgartner had several conversations with an undercover RCMP officer, court heard. Baumgartner initially told the officer his name was David Webb – the real name of the fictional character of Jason Bourne – and he didn’t remember the events of the past few days.

According to the Agreed Statement of Facts, Baumgartner eventually told the undercover officer, “I did it all… killed those people and took their truck.”

On Monday, court heard 12 victim impact statements from the victims’ loved ones.

Story continues below advertisement

“She was the one thing I was absolutely sure of in life,” said Victor Shegelski, Michelle’s husband. “My perfect woman… is dead.”

Cheryl Ernst, Michelle’s mother, spoke next.

“I’m devastated, completely devastated,” she sobbed. “My heart is in my throat.”

“Imagine having to hope that your daughter is in critical condition, because that would be the good news.”

Family members could be heard crying throughout the courtroom. Baumgartner sat, arms crossed, emotionless.

When Michelle’s aunt was reading her victim impact statement and turned to Baumgartner to ask “was Michelle thinking ‘how can I stop you?’,” he looked up at her briefly.

Cleo Rejano, Eddie’s wife, walked to the front of the room with one of her two young sons.

“I never thought of becoming a widow at the age of 32,” she said. She explained how her “heart aches and bleeds” for her two boys who miss their daddy.

As she struggled through her statement, Rejano’s youngest son Xylar picked up a tissue and wiped a tear from his mother’s cheek.

Brian Ilesic’s parents Dianna and Mike read their victim impact statements and asked Baumgartner how he could have “turned on his co-workers when they trusted him.”

Story continues below advertisement

“There was no dignity in Brian’s death,” says Dianna. “We never got the chance to say goodbye.”

Co-Crown prosecutor Tania Holland read Matthew Schuman’s victim impact statement. He said he’s lost a portion of his brain from the gunshot wound, has lost feeling in his right side, and has lost vision in the right side of both eyes. Schuman spent three months at the Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital.

He explained how the shooting has affected him emotionally. He said the brain injury makes him snap at Jennifer, the mother of his child. Jennifer explained in her statement that the two no longer live together.

“You took my career, my health… my future,” read Schuman’s statement.

“You destroyed our family,” Jennifer’s statement reads.

After the victim impact statements were read, the Crown made the joint submission for sentencing:

For the murder of Brian Ilesic (to which Baumgartner pleaded guilty in the second-degree), a life sentence with parole ineligibility for 15 years, to be served consecutively was submitted.

For the murder of Eddie Rejano (to which Baumgartner pleaded guilty in the first-degree), a life sentence with parole ineligibility for 25 years, to be served consecutively was submitted.

For the murder of Michelle Shegelski (to which Baumgartner pleaded guilty in the second-degree), a life sentence with parole ineligibility for 15 years, to be served concurrently was submitted.

Story continues below advertisement

For the attempted murder of Matthew Schuman (to which Baumgartner pleaded guilty), a life sentence with parole ineligibility for 10 years, to be served concurrently was submitted.

The global sentence submitted jointly by the Crown and the Defence was a life sentence with parole ineligibility for 40 years.

“This was a primary intent murder,” said Bilodeau while outlining the aggravating factors, which also included harm to the community, and reckless disregard for the safety of others.

Bilodeau added the mitigating factors were the youth of the accused, his lack of criminal record, and the timing of the guilty plea.

Justice John Rooke discussed the issues of the parole ineligibility period and consecutive versus concurrent parole ineligibility periods with the lawyers.

Under a new law, judges can use discretion when sentencing multiple murderers in terms of changing parole ineligibility terms from concurrent to consecutive.

In August, Baumgartner requested to be tried by judge alone.

Baumgartner will be 61-years-old before he’ll be eligible for parole.

“Assuming Travis Baumgartner survives 40 years in prison, he could appeal to the Parole Board in 2052,” said Bilodeau.

“Just because you’re eligible, doesn’t mean you get it,” noted Defence lawyer Peter Royal. “No Parole Board is going to look on him favourably.”

Story continues below advertisement

With files from Emily Mertz and Laurel Clark

Sponsored content

AdChoices