Meng accused of ‘commercial dishonesty’ as extradition case enters final stage

Click to play video: 'Lawyers argue for stay as extradition hearing starts for Meng Wanzhou'
Lawyers argue for stay as extradition hearing starts for Meng Wanzhou
After more than two years of legal wrangling the formal extradition hearing for Meng Wanzhou finally got underway in B.C. Supreme Court Wednesday. – Aug 11, 2021

The United States has laid out a case against Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou that shows her actions meet the classic definition of “commercial dishonesty,” said a lawyer for Canada’s attorney general, as her case entered its final stage in the B.C. Supreme Court.

Robert Frater said the allegations of what Meng both said and left unsaid in a presentation to international bank HSBC in 2013 represent the essential elements of fraud and she should be extradited to face charges.

“The evidence of dishonesty in this case we say is abundantly clear,” Frater told the judge Wednesday.

Meng was arrested at Vancouver’s airport in December 2018 at the request of the United States in a move that soured Canada’s relationship with China.

Story continues below advertisement

Her long-awaited extradition hearing is proceeding as courts in China prosecute Canadians whose sentencing or detentions are widely seen as retaliation for her arrest.

Entrepreneur Michael Spavor was found guilty of espionage and sentenced to 11 years, while Canadian Robert Schellenberg’s 15-year sentence for smuggling drugs was increased to the death penalty on Tuesday. Michael Kovrig stood trial in March but there has been no word on when a verdict might be announced.

Click to play video: 'Extradition hearing for Meng Wanzhou enters final weeks'
Extradition hearing for Meng Wanzhou enters final weeks

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau condemned Spavor’s sentence following his “arbitrary detention” and pledged that officials would work “around the clock” to secure both his and Kovrig’s release.

Asked whether Canada was negotiating over possibly sending Meng home in exchange for the release of Spavor and Kovrig, Canadian Ambassador to China Dominic Barton said, “There are intensive efforts and discussions. I don’t want to talk in any detail about that. But that will continue.”

Story continues below advertisement

The fraud charges against Meng centre on a meeting she held in a Hong Kong tea room in 2013 with a senior HSBC banker.

Meng, who is Huawei’s chief financial officer and the daughter of the Chinese telecom giant’s founder, denies allegations that she put HSBC at risk of breaking U.S. sanctions during a PowerPoint presentation she gave that day.

But Frater accused Meng of making statements to a senior banker eight years ago that “went to some length to demonstrate that Huawei had a rigorous approach to sanctions compliance, and that Huawei demanded the same of any partners working in Iran.”

She neglected to tell the banker that Huawei controlled the company, Skycom, that was the subject of HSBC’s concern, he said.

“It’s about leaving an impression. And the message was received exactly as it was intended,” Frater said.

Click to play video: 'Canada’s Michael Spavor sentenced to 11 years in prison by Chinese court'
Canada’s Michael Spavor sentenced to 11 years in prison by Chinese court

Associate Chief Justice Heather Holmes’ task in the extradition hearing is not to determine whether Meng is guilty but to decide whether the United States has provided sufficient evidence to support a case against her, Frater told the court.

Story continues below advertisement

An extradition hearing is not a trial and weighing competing inferences is not an extradition judge’s job, he said.

In order to be extradited, the court must find that the conduct of the person would be considered a crime in Canada had it occurred in this country.

“It is now crystal clear that the central goal of the law of fraud in Canada is to prevent dishonesty in commercial dealings, and we say this case is a case about dishonest commercial dealings,” Frater said.

Even if Holmes rules Meng should be committed for surrender to the United States, the extradition isn’t certain. The ruling can still face appeals and the final decision, under the Extradition Act, rests with Canada’s justice minister.

Click to play video: 'Ottawa pressured to help Canadians detained in China'
Ottawa pressured to help Canadians detained in China

In the years since her arrest, Meng’s legal team has launched a series of arguments seeking her release on grounds that she was subjected to abuses of process that have tainted the case.

Story continues below advertisement

They claim there were more than 30 instances of misconduct or abuse in her case, ranging from political interference by then-U.S. president Donald Trump, who indicated a willingness to intervene if it benefited U.S.-China trade negotiations, to intentionally poor note keeping by Canadian border officers and police involved in her arrest.

Holmes has not yet made a ruling on whether the allegations of abuse are valid. If she does, Meng’s defence has argued for a stay in proceedings that would secure her release.

Meng’s team is expected to respond to the government’s extradition arguments beginning Friday and the hearing is set to wrap up by Aug. 20, although the judge may take months preparing a decision.

Sponsored content