Lawyers for Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou ask judge for adjournment in final extradition hearings

Click to play video: 'Meng Wanzhou lawyers apply for delay in extradition hearing'
Meng Wanzhou lawyers apply for delay in extradition hearing
Lawyers for Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou are asking a Vancouver court for a delay in her extradition hearing, in order to review new documents they claim will "set the case on its head." Grace Ke reports – Apr 19, 2021

VANCOUVER — Lawyers for Meng Wanzhou asked a B.C. Supreme Court judge Monday to delay the final leg of hearings in the Huawei executive’s extradition case one week before it is set to begin.

Richard Peck said the legal team needs time to review new evidence obtained through a court order in Hong Kong that could support its argument that the United States misled Canadian officials in describing the allegations against Meng.

Click to play video: 'Meng Wanzhou defence says Donald Trump comments tainted process'
Meng Wanzhou defence says Donald Trump comments tainted process

“What we request is a reasonable time in which to assess the documents and determine their likely admissibility,” he said.

Story continues below advertisement

In response, a lawyer for Canada’s attorney general argued there’s no basis to believe the documents will be relevant and accused Meng’s team of trying to turn the extradition hearing into a trial.

Click to play video: 'Lawyers for Huawei executive cast doubts on who knew what, when'
Lawyers for Huawei executive cast doubts on who knew what, when

After 2 1/2 years of legal proceedings, “and mere days from reaching the finish line, the applicant asks this court to take a several month pause. Her request should be denied,” the Crown said in a written response.

The latest health and medical news emailed to you every Sunday.

Meng was arrested at Vancouver’s airport in 2018 at the request of the U.S. to face fraud charges that both she and Huawei deny.

Click to play video: 'Meng Wanzhou arrives at B.C. courthouse to hear bail condition verdict'
Meng Wanzhou arrives at B.C. courthouse to hear bail condition verdict

She is accused of lying to HSBC about Huawei’s control of subsidiary Skycom during a presentation in 2013, putting the bank at risk of violating U.S. sanctions against Iran.

Story continues below advertisement

The court has heard that Huawei sold Skycom to Canicula Holdings, another company that Huawei controlled financially, in 2007.

While Meng’s Canadian lawyers have not yet seen most of the documents from HSBC and their contents are unclear, Peck said it’s believed they will shed light on what the bank knew about the relationship between the companies and how much it relied on Meng’s 2013 presentation.

“We say these materials are relevant because they are referenced from the very bank at the very time including the very parties involved in this matter,” Peck said.

Meng’s team also said in court documents that Canada’s attorney general should launch an investigation into whether Meng was arrested based on inaccurate information.

Peck proposed that the final three weeks of the hearing, set to begin April 26, be adjourned until Aug. 3 to allow time for such a probe, as well as for COVID-19 cases to subside.

Click to play video: 'Huawei asks Vancouver court to relax bail conditions'
Huawei asks Vancouver court to relax bail conditions

But Robert Frater, a lawyer for Canada’s attorney general, said there’s no evidence to believe the new documents are relevant to the extradition case.

Story continues below advertisement

Meng’s team relies entirely on two letters from Huawei’s U.S. lawyers in which allegations are made, but support for the allegations is redacted and those lawyers are “aligned” with Meng, he said.

He added that the U.S. has “vigorously” denied the allegations, so Meng’s team is essentially asking the B.C. Supreme Court to weigh one side against the other, a job better suited for the U.S. trial.

Frater also accused Meng’s team of “jurisdiction shopping” for a court that would approve the document disclosure.

Meng’s lawyers previously failed in an effort to access the same documents through a court in the United Kingdom.

“Having received the answer ‘no’ from the U.K. court, then my friends went to Hong Kong and inexplicably, HSBC, which was the same litigant that appeared in the court in the U.K., completely reversed its position after having won on every single point in the U.K. court,” Frater said.

“HSBC for reasons known only to itself turned around and decided to agree to an order.”

Frater called the adjournment application an “11th hour” request, adding the Hong Kong court provided no timeline for when the documents might be shared with Meng’s team.

There’s no credible basis for an independent investigation and Canada has no duty to investigate the evidence underlying extradition requests made by its treaty partners, he said.

Story continues below advertisement

The broad public interest in Meng’s extradition case only adds to the urgency of wrapping it up, he said.

“Extraditions hearings are supposed to be expeditious,” Frater said.

Associate Chief Justice Heather Holmes reserved her decision until Wednesday.

Sponsored content