Menu

Topics

Connect

Comments

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.

Lawyer for Meng Wanzhou urges judge to turf Mountie’s claim that he didn’t share info with FBI

Huawei's Meng Wanzhou leaves her home to attend a hearing at B.C. Supreme Court, in Vancouver, on Monday, March 22, 2021. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck

VANCOUVER — A lawyer for Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou says a retired Mountie’s refusal to testify in the extradition case adds weight to an argument that the officer shared information about her devices with U.S. investigators.

Story continues below advertisement

Scott Fenton told a B.C. Supreme Court judge that former staff sergeant Ben Chang is the “most important witness” on the issue of whether electronic serial numbers were improperly shared with the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

The daily email you need for BC's top news stories.
Get the day's top stories from BC and surrounding communities, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Get daily BC news

Get the day's top stories from BC and surrounding communities, delivered to your inbox once a day.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

The court has heard Chang was asked by the FBI for information about Meng’s devices in order to enter a legal request to obtain them, although there is no direct evidence the information was sent.

Story continues below advertisement

Fenton says Chang retired six months after Meng’s arrest, moved to Macau and refused to testify, beyond filing an affidavit saying he did not share the information.

The arguments are part of a hearing that will determine if Meng was subjected to an abuse of process by Canadian officials, and if proven the judge will decide whether extradition proceedings should be stayed against her.

Meng is wanted in the United States on fraud charges related to violations of U.S. sanctions against Iran, which both she and Huawei deny.

Story continues below advertisement

Fenton called the refusal of the former RCMP officer to submit to cross-examination “one of the more troubling elements in the case” and “unprecedented.”

He urged the judge to give no weight to Chang’s written testimony and instead to take an “adverse inference,” or conclude that the cross-examination would have undermined the claims in his affidavit.

Advertisement

You are viewing an Accelerated Mobile Webpage.

View Original Article