Advertisement

Trudeau’s WE Charity defence still marred by ‘pretty big hole,’ says Scheer

Click to play video: 'Trudeau, Poilievre engage in heated exchange regarding dollar amount paid out to Trudeau family by WE Charity'
Trudeau, Poilievre engage in heated exchange regarding dollar amount paid out to Trudeau family by WE Charity
WATCH: Conservative MP Pierre Poilievre grilled Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Thursday during a virtual House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance regarding the WE Charity affair – Jul 30, 2020

Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer says the defence offered by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau before a parliamentary committee studying his actions in the WE Charity scandal remains marred by a “pretty big hole” over Trudeau’s admission he knew his family’s ties to the group would be scrutinized.

In an interview with The West Block guest host Farah Nasser, Scheer said the Conservatives don’t buy the argument offered by Trudeau at the House of Commons finance committee.

READ MORE: Trudeau says he didn’t know WE Charity might get grant until matter came to cabinet

In that testimony, Trudeau said he paused a proposal to give the WE Charity a sole-sourced deal to administer a student grant program in part because he believed his family’s ties would raise questions — but still did not seek an opinion from the ethics commissioner before failing to recuse himself.

Story continues below advertisement
Click to play video: 'The same inner circle is advising the Prime Minister on the WE ethics scandal as on previous ethics controversies'
The same inner circle is advising the Prime Minister on the WE ethics scandal as on previous ethics controversies

“What we heard on Thursday just raises more questions,” said Scheer.

“If the prime minister would have us believe that he was concerned enough about the conflict of interest to push back on the public service but not to check with the ethics commissioner — well, that’s a pretty big hole in his defense.”

However, Scheer suggested he has no plans to try to force an election and instead wants the government to “come clean” and release more documents detailing how the determination was made that the WE Charity was the only group capable of running the student grant program.

READ MORE: 5 takeaways from Trudeau’s testimony in WE Charity scandal investigation

Breaking news from Canada and around the world sent to your email, as it happens.

That’s been the explanation offered by multiple top officials during the finance committee hearings over recent weeks, citing the determinations made by the public service.

Story continues below advertisement
Click to play video: 'Finance committee grills Trudeau during WE Charity testimony'
Finance committee grills Trudeau during WE Charity testimony

Scheer said he has been clear he will resign once the Conservative party elects a new leader.

Voting by mail has been taking place for weeks given the coronavirus pandemic restrictions and the party says it will announce the results in late August.

ANALYSIS: Scheer’s silence on a question of ‘sin’ a barrier to Conservative election hopes

Nasser asked Scheer what advice he would give to his successor and whether he believes the party needs to do a better job of recruiting Black, Indigenous and people of colour to run as candidates.

“Well, obviously, when you don’t win an election, you have to go back and look and see how you can appeal to more Canadians. We were able to build on a lot of success,” Scheer said, pointing to the increase in seats compared to when he took over the leadership.

Story continues below advertisement

READ MORE: Baird report on why Tories lost the election is finished, but won’t be made public

“We always have to look at how we can attract more people to the Conservative message. I believe that the Conservative message of individual freedom, personal choice, individual responsibility, love for our country, appreciation of our history and our belief in free-market principles, that’s what creates prosperity in this country.”

“You didn’t answer my question,” Nasser pushed back. “Do you think, though, that we need to see more diversity within your party? And I’ll push out of it further — do you think systemic racism exists within your own party?”

“Look, our party believes in the fundamental worth of all human beings, regardless of their race, regardless of their ethnicity,” Scheer said. “As I said, we always have to do a better job to reach out to a broader section of Canadians.”

“We had a great set of diverse candidates representing every single walk of life in this country. We had members of so many different types of backgrounds,” he continued.

“It was great to be a leader during a campaign where we had that kind of diversity among our candidates. We did a great job of showing Canadians that we are a tolerant, inclusive party with a message that appeals to everybody.”

Story continues below advertisement

The Conservative Party has faced criticism that some of its rhetoric around irregular migration is racist and that officials in the party are not doing enough to root out racism, particularly anti-Muslim views.

Scheer insisted last year that there is “no room for intolerance, racism or extremism” in the party.

Click to play video: 'George Floyd protests: Scheer opposes defunding the RCMP'
George Floyd protests: Scheer opposes defunding the RCMP

But Conservative leadership candidates vying to replace Scheer were divided during their English language debate on June 18 about how to tackle systemic racism.

Peter MacKay and Leslyn Lewis both acknowledged systemic racism is real while Derek Sloan and Erin O’Toole were less clear — O’Toole would not use the word and did not answer clearly when pressed on whether he believes it exists.

READ MORE: Conservative leadership candidates split on how to address systemic racism in Canada

Canada is among the many countries in the midst of a national conversation about the need to dismantle systemic racism in the wake of global anti-racism protests following the death of George Floyd, a Black American man, during an arrest by police in Minneapolis.

Story continues below advertisement

The cop arresting him –who has since been fired– knelt on Floyd’s neck for nearly nine minutes, and has been charged in connection with the death, along with three other officers alleged to have been involved.

–With files from Global’s Sean Boynton.

Sponsored content

AdChoices