Jury finds Katy Perry’s ‘Dark Horse’ copied Christian rap song

WATCH: Katy Perry's 'Dark Horse' (featuring Juicy J)

Katy Perry improperly copied a 2008 Christian rap song with her 2013 hit, Dark Horse, a jury has found.

The decision, which came down Monday morning in a Los Angeles courtroom, stemmed from a lawsuit filed back in 2014 by musician Marcus Gray and his team of songwriters.

Gray, best known as Flame, accused Perry, 34, of using instrumental elements of his original — and underground — song, Joyful Noisewithout permission.

WATCH: Official music video for Flame’s ‘Joyful Noise’

The plaintiffs targeted not only Perry, but her team as well, including co-songwriters: Cirkut, Dr. Luke, Max Martin, Sarah Hudson and American rapper Juicy J, who is also featured on Dark Horse.

Story continues below advertisement

The Associated Press confirmed Perry’s loss on Tuesday. According to AP reports, she was not present when the decision was made.

READ MORE: Katy Perry takes the stand to deny ‘Dark Horse’ plagiarism accusation

Although the verdict was that the Roar singer was guilty of copyright infringement, the trial is not yet complete.

On Tuesday, the penalty phase is scheduled to take place, which will determine exactly how much Perry and the other five defendants owe the plaintiffs as a result of their acts of plagiarism.

The final day of the trial is set to begin with opening arguments between both parties.

Katy Perry seen shopping at Liberty London on May 1, 2019 in London, England. Ricky Vigil/GC Images

Although the defendants were sued only for the usage of specific notes and beats in Dark Horse, none of the writers were left off the hook.

Story continues below advertisement

Perry and Hudson wrote the lyrics together, while Juicy J provided his own verse. Neither utilized any elements from Joyful Noise, however, the jurors found that all six writers were guilty of copyright infringement.

READ MORE: The ‘whitewashing’ of Black music: A dark chapter in rock history

As reported by the Associated Press, Gray’s attorneys argued that the main instrumental beat used throughout most of Dark Horse was “substantially similar” to those of Joyful Noise.

During her official testimony, nearly two weeks ago, Perry claimed that before the lawsuit came about, she had heard of neither Joyful Noise or Gray.

Perry’s own lawyer, Christine Lepera, backed her up by saying that the musical elements used in Dark Horse are so simple that it would affect the majority of songwriters.

WATCH: Orlando Bloom Talks ‘Carnival Row’ Tackling Real-World Issues

Click to play video: 'Orlando Bloom Talks ‘Carnival Row’ Tackling Real-World Issues'
Orlando Bloom Talks ‘Carnival Row’ Tackling Real-World Issues

“They’re trying to own basic building blocks of music, the alphabet of music that should be available to everyone,” Lepera claimed during Thursday’s closing arguments.

Story continues below advertisement

Their musical expert claimed that the Dark Horse beat was almost as simple as the centuries-old children’s nursery rhyme, Mary Had a Little Lamb.

READ MORE: Who is Lizzo?: Everything you need to know about the ‘Truth Hurts’ singer

The jury disagreed with the defendants’ arguments, deciding that the elements used in Joyful Noise were original enough to hold copyright standards.

The music video for Dark Horse currently holds more than 2.6 billion views on YouTube alone, as opposed to Joyful Noise’s 2.4 million.

— With files from the Associated Press

Sponsored content