Advertisement

Hamilton city councillors vote against ranked ballot in next municipal election

Hamilton city councillors have voted not to study ranked balloting as an option for the next municipal election.
Hamilton city councillors have voted not to study ranked balloting as an option for the next municipal election. File/Global News

In Hamilton, it will be first-past-the-post again for the 2022 municipal election.

City councillors, in an 8-7 vote, have decided not to have staff study and report back on the option of ranked balloting in the next municipal election.

Under the ranked balloting system, which was adopted for the first time in London, Ont. last fall, voters order their preferences and votes are counted and choices are eliminated one by one, until a candidate receives a majority and is declared the winner.

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Get daily National news

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

WATCH: Kingston city council votes in favour of referendum question for ranked ballot voting (Feb. 2018)

Click to play video: 'City council votes in favour of referendum question for ranked ballot voting'
City council votes in favour of referendum question for ranked ballot voting

Hamilton Mayor Fred Eisenberger supported taking a closer look and the possibility that it could result in more citizens getting “engaged” in the process.

Story continues below advertisement

Councillors also heard from a number of residents who spoke in support of ranked balloting on Tuesday morning.

Nicholas Tsergas believes it is a “best antidote” against “toxic election campaigns,” while Fiona Parascandalo thinks it would encourage people to start voting for who they want to win, “instead of against who they want to lose.”

Ward 6 Coun. Tom Jackson was among those who voted against studying the change.

He argues that the first-past-the-post system is cheaper, easier to understand and produces quicker results.

Sponsored content

AdChoices