January 11, 2019 11:12 am

‘No consent, no pipeline’: UBCIC President says Wet’suwet’en hereditary chiefs have been ignored

A deal has been reached between protesting First Nations and RCMP, allowing crews access to a B.C. gas pipeline project. John Hua has the details.

A A

“It’s very simple. No consent, no pipeline.”

That’s Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, president of the Union of BC Indian Chiefs, speaking about the Coastal GasLink pipeline project.

According to Phillip, there’s been no real resolution reached despite Thursday’s agreement between RCMP and the Wet’suwet’en Nation at the Coastal GasLink site, and you can expect to hear more about protests in the coming year.

Story continues below

READ MORE: First Nations, RCMP reach deal in northern B.C. pipeline impasse

Phillip said detractors who claim protesters are breaking the rule of law aren’t noticing that the federal government is ignoring its own policy of First Nations consultation and consent with hereditary chiefs.

“The law clearly states that not only must there be substantial and thorough consultation, but there must also be consent. It must involve both parties, both elected and traditional,” Phillip said.

Phillip said the issue of consent is a common one along prominent “battlegrounds” in B.C., where projects are being acted on against the wishes of the First Nations who have traditionally lived on the land in question.

“Not only does that apply to the Unist’ot’en Healing Centre, but of course we know it applies to the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion Project as well as the ongoing battle with Site C,” Phillip said.

“Believing that 2019 will not be a battleground is a complete misread of the current reality.”

READ MORE: Why did RCMP arrest 14 people at Wet’suwet’en Camp, and what happens next?

Phillip said there’s a huge difference between First Nations consultation and consent, and both the hereditary and elected chiefs need to be involved at all levels of major projects.

“The proper title holders are the people themselves. So you cannot take a shortcut and just simply engage the elected band council system and call it a day and expect to move these projects forward.”

He said the Canadian government has drawn international flak for its methods in dealing with contentious projects like the Site C dam. On Dec. 14, the United Nations sent a letter requesting Canada to suspend construction of the Site C dam until it receives “free, prior and informed consent” from the Indigenous community.

READ MORE: B.C. First Nations seek injunction to halt Site C project on Peace River

‘The law is the law,’ critics say

Not everyone agrees with the protesters’ methods. Business Council of British Columbia CEO Greg D’Avignon says the law is the law: decisions have been made by the federal government, and protesters have to accept it.

“They have a full right to protest those decisions, but it’s not in keeping with the governance, structure, and legal process that’s in Canada today,” D’Avignon said.

“Business needs the certainty of the rule of law, and that’s what we’re counting on Canada and British Columbia to uphold.”

D’Avignon said Coastal GasLink and LNG Canada went through the proper channels to build a “deep, lasting and meaningful relationship with the First Nations involved,” and to allow First Nations to benefit from the projects.

READ MORE: Celebrities including Ellen Page, Susan Sarandon voice support for northern B.C. anti-pipeline camp

He said projects might not please everyone, but once the decision has been made, it needs to be business as usual.

“You can protest but you can’t do it in a way that is illegal or that gets in the way of the intent of the decision going forward.”

Fourteen protesters were arrested at a blockade set up by members of the Wet’suwet’en Nation on Monday.

© 2019 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Report an error

Comments

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.