Advertisement

Newly-signed USMCA points at increased auto imports, watered-down LGBTQ protections

Click to play video: 'USMCA deal signed by Trudeau, Trump and Pena Nieto'
USMCA deal signed by Trudeau, Trump and Pena Nieto
WATCH: USMCA deal signed by Trudeau, Trump and Pena Nieto – Nov 30, 2018

OTTAWA – Initial analysis on the final text of the new North American trade pact Canada signed on Friday is pointing to two changes – one potentially helpful for the auto sector, the other potentially problematic for labour rights.

Cars and Automotive Parts

Canada, just like Mexico, signed what is known as a side letter – a one-on-one provision connected to, but not formally part of the trade deal text – on automotive imports. Canada will be able to export up to 2.6 million passenger vehicles into the United States tariff-free. The limit is well above current levels of about 1.8 million vehicles, and the country isn’t forecasted to reach the quota until at least a decade from now, as vehicle production in Canada declines along with consumer demand, said Juan Manuel Herrera, an economist with Scotiabank Economics.

WATCH: GM closures example of why steel tariffs creates economic barriers. Trudeau tells Trump

Story continues below advertisement
Click to play video: 'Trudeau to Trump: GM closures example of why steel tariffs creates economic barriers'
Trudeau to Trump: GM closures example of why steel tariffs creates economic barriers

A change also specifies that tariffs won’t apply to those vehicles even if they don’t meet rules of origin provisions in the trade deal, which lay out continental content and labour requirements to be considered tariff-free.

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Get daily National news

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

“People were afraid that the side letters would also give power to the U.S. in how Canada decides how to allocate this 2.6 million exemption,” Herrera said. “But … the Canadian government, or Canadian firms, are the ones who will distribute this exemption as they see fit – it’s not that the U.S. is the one who gets to pick.”

READ MORE: Trump says he will tell Congress soon to terminate NAFTA

Also of note: The side letter is effective immediately.

Sexual orientation, gender identity and labour rights

The original text of the agreement pledged all three countries to support “policies that protect workers against employment discrimination on the basis of sex, including with regard to pregnancy, sexual harassment, sexual orientation, gender identity.”

Story continues below advertisement

But the final agreement has a change in language that various analyses suggest will water down its reach: The new wording calls on each country to implement policies each “considers appropriate to protect workers against employment discrimination on the basis of sex.” A footnote on the agreement says American federal hiring policies “are sufficient to fulfil the obligations” on labour rights, and “thus requires no additional action” by the U.S.

WATCH: Quebec says the USMCA needs to be further negotiated

Click to play video: 'Quebec says the USMCA needs to be further negotiated'
Quebec says the USMCA needs to be further negotiated

Some congressional Republicans have already suggested they won’t support the deal with any wording on sexual orientation or gender identity because they feel it goes too far. Critics who supported the original provision feel the new wording doesn’t go far enough.

WATCH: Freeland says late changes to USMCA protect Canadian dairy farmers

Click to play video: 'Late changes to USMCA protect Canadian dairy farmers: Freeland'
Late changes to USMCA protect Canadian dairy farmers: Freeland

“Honestly, whatever you think of the LGBTQ provisions in the new NAFTA, this outcome – to include them but nullify them with a footnote – is ridiculous,” tweeted Geoffrey Getz, a fellow at the Washington, D.C.-based Brookings Institution.

Story continues below advertisement

“It’s the kind of thing that will make progressives even more suspicious of engaging with trade liberalization.”

Sponsored content

AdChoices