The White House has given the FBI clearance to interview anyone it wants to by Friday in its investigation of sexual misconduct allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.
The new guidance, described to The Associated Press by a person familiar with it, was issued to the FBI over the weekend in response to Democratic and news media pushback that the scope of the probe was too narrow.
It comes as the FBI presses ahead with its investigation, questioning in recent days at least two people about accusations of misconduct against Kavanaugh dating to when he was in high school and college.
READ MORE: Trump says he wants ‘comprehensive’ FBI probe into Kavanaugh allegations — not a ‘witch hunt’
President Donald Trump, addressing those concerns at a news conference Monday, said he wants the FBI to do a “comprehensive” investigation and “it wouldn’t bother me at all” if agents pursued accusations made by three women who have come forward publicly. But he also said Senate Republicans are determining the parameters of the investigation and “ultimately, they’re making the judgment.”
“My White House will do whatever the senators want,” Trump said. “The one thing I want is speed.”
WATCH: Sen. Flake pushes for full FBI investigation of Kavanaugh allegations
The White House instructed the FBI to interview anyone it deems relevant to the inquiry, but required the work to be done by Friday, according to the person familiar with the discussions, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations.
The revised guidance was aimed at promoting an investigation that could tamp down Democratic criticism and satisfy on-the-fence Republicans about its thoroughness and fairness while also ensuring a fixed deadline to prevent the probe from becoming open-ended and spanning weeks.
Officials said it was possible, but not likely, the bureau could complete its work before Friday.
READ MORE: Republicans’ prosecutor for Kavanaugh hearing says she wouldn’t lay criminal charges
Trump said a comprehensive investigation is “a good thing” for Kavanaugh. He said that while it was fine that the FBI wants to interview all three women who have made accusations, “we don’t want to go on a witch hunt, do we?”
As Republicans and Democrats quarreled over whether the FBI would have enough time and freedom to conduct a thorough investigation before a vote on the nomination, agents over the weekend interviewed Deborah Ramirez — a Yale University classmate who has said Kavanaugh exposed himself to her when both were students at Yale in the early 1980s.
Ramirez also provided investigators with the names of others who she said could corroborate her account, according to a person familiar with her questioning. Kavanaugh has denied the allegation.
WATCH: Trump says he doesn’t think Kavanaugh lied about his drinking
A separate accuser, California college professor Christine Blasey Ford, had not been contacted by the FBI as of Monday afternoon to schedule an interview, according to a person close to her.
Ford has accused Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her when they were teenagers, sharing the allegation at an extraordinary congressional hearing last week that also included Kavanaugh’s angry and emotional denial.
The FBI, meanwhile, interviewed another person who Ford said attended the gathering where she says she was attacked.
READ MORE: Brett Kavanaugh was a ‘frequent drinker, and a heavy drinker,’ Yale classmate says
That man, Patrick “P.J.” Smyth, answered “every question” he was asked and told agents he had “no knowledge” of the small gathering that Ford described, according to his attorney, Eric Bruce. Smyth also told the FBI he doesn’t have “knowledge of Ford’s allegations of improper conduct against Kavanaugh,” Bruce said.
Since Trump, under pressure from three undecided Republicans, ordered the FBI to reopen Kavanaugh’s background check Friday, the White House has scrambled to defend the process from Democratic complaints that certain witnesses were being kept off-limits.
Officials insisted that they were not “micromanaging” the new one-week review of Kavanaugh’s background and insisted that Republican senators were dictating the inquiry’s scope.
WATCH: White House denies limiting FBI probe into Kavanaugh
But questions about the investigation’s expansiveness mounted as additional witnesses came forward with accounts they wanted to present to the FBI about Kavanaugh’s behavior.
In a statement Sunday, a Yale classmate of Kavanaugh’s said he is “deeply troubled by what has been a blatant mischaracterization by Brett himself of his drinking at Yale.” Charles “Chad” Ludington, who now teaches at North Carolina State University, said he was a friend of Kavanaugh’s at Yale and said Kavanaugh was “a frequent drinker, and a heavy drinker.”
While saying that youthful drinking should not condemn a person for life, Ludington said he was concerned about Kavanaugh’s statements under oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
READ MORE: White House is not ‘micromanaging’ FBI investigation into Kavanaugh, officials say
A third woman, Julie Swetnick, accused Kavanaugh and his friend Mark Judge of excessive drinking and inappropriate treatment of women in the early 1980s, among other accusations. Kavanaugh has called her accusations a “joke.” Judge “categorically” denies the allegations.
Swetnick’s attorney, Michael Avenatti, said Monday that his client was willing to cooperate with the FBI but has not been contacted.
Ford also has said Judge was in the room when a drunken Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her. Judge has said he will cooperate with any law enforcement agency that will “confidentially investigate” sexual misconduct allegations against him and Kavanaugh. Judge has also denied misconduct allegations.
WATCH: U.S. senator says if Kavanaugh lied, Supreme Court nomination is over
As the fresh review unfolded, the prosecutor brought in by Republicans to question Ford at last week’s hearing outlined in a memo why she did not believe criminal charges would be brought against Kavanaugh if it were a criminal case rather than a Supreme Court confirmation process.
Rachel Mitchell argued that that there were inconsistencies in Ford’s narrative and said no one has corroborated Ford’s account. Ford was not questioned as part of a criminal proceeding but in the confirmation process.
Comments