OTTAWA —Liberal MPs have shot down the request to delve into the issue of whether it is appropriate for a politician to routinely use the Constitution’s controversial notwithstanding clause to override a court’s decision.
The governing MPs voted against NDP justice critic Murray Rankin’s motion proposing the justice and human rights committee study the routine use of the clause.
READ MORE: Ontario’s appeal court sides with Ford government, paves way for 25-ward Toronto election
Rankin says his motion, while prompted by recent comments made by Ontario Premier Doug Ford, is not intended to single out a premier or event.
Get breaking National news
The notwithstanding clause gives provincial legislatures and Parliament the ability to usher in legislation that overrides provisions of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms for a five-year period.
WATCH: Ipsos poll gauges how Canadian’s reactions to Doug Ford’s use of the notwithstanding clause
- Advocates brace for possible influx of Haitian asylum seekers as U.S. protections end
- Kelowna businesses see economic boost as BC Summer Games draw thousands
- Montreal Pride boosting security ahead of festival after deadly Berlin attack
- Minister vows probe of ‘quite serious’ charges against Canadian NATO intern
Rankin’s motion was defeated five to four.
Conservative MPs Tony Clement, Michael Cooper and Dave MacKenzie supported Rankin’s motion.
Comments
Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.