Advertisement

U.S. judge rules against Trump administration’s move to end Dreamers program

Click to play video: 'U.S. Supreme Court rebuffs President Trump on ‘Dreamers’' U.S. Supreme Court rebuffs President Trump on ‘Dreamers’
WATCH ABOVE: U.S. Supreme Court rebuffs President Trump on 'Dreamers' – Feb 27, 2018

A federal judge ruled Tuesday against the Trump administration‘s decision to end a program protecting some young immigrants from deportation, calling the Department of Homeland Security‘s rationale against the program “arbitrary and capricious.”

U.S. District Judge John D. Bates in Washington wrote that the decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, known as DACA, “was unlawful and must be set aside.”

READ MORE: Nancy Pelosi spoke of Dreamers for 8 straight hours to protest budget deal

Bates wrote that DHS’ decision “was predicated primarily on its legal judgment that the program was unlawful. That legal judgment was virtually unexplained, however, and so it cannot support the agency’s decision.”

WATCH: DACA not about the ‘Dreamers’ says Trump in speech to GOP

Click to play video: 'DACA not about the ‘Dreamers’ says Trump in speech to GOP' DACA not about the ‘Dreamers’ says Trump in speech to GOP
DACA not about the ‘Dreamers’ says Trump in speech to GOP – Feb 1, 2018

Bates gave DHS 90 days to “better explain its view that DACA is unlawful.” If the department cannot come up with a better explanation, he wrote, it “must accept and process new as well as renewal DACA applications.”

Story continues below advertisement

READ MORE: Judge says he can’t ignore Trump’s ‘vicious’ anti-immigrant comments when ruling on DACA

DACA allowed immigrants brought to the U.S. illegally as children, known as Dreamers, to stay and work legally under renewable permits. President Donald Trump announced last year that he would end the program started by President Barack Obama. It was officially rescinded in March, but DHS is continuing to issue renewals because of previous court orders.

Bates’ ruling Tuesday night comes in a pair of cases whose lead plaintiffs are the NAACP and Princeton University. He is the third judge to rule against administration plans to end the program.

 

Sponsored content